Suppr超能文献

1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者之间内皮功能的差异:红细胞和精氨酸酶的影响。

Differences in endothelial function between patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: effects of red blood cells and arginase.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 2024 Aug 7;138(15):975-985. doi: 10.1042/CS20240447.

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes (T1DM and T2DM) are unresolved. The red blood cells (RBCs) with increased arginase activity induce endothelial dysfunction in T2DM, but the implications of RBCs and the role of arginase inhibition in T1DM are unexplored. We aimed to investigate the differences in endothelial function in patients with T1DM and T2DM, with focus on RBCs and arginase. Thirteen patients with T1DM and twenty-six patients with T2DM, matched for HbA1c and sex were included. In vivo endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation (EDV and EIDV) were assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography before and after administration of an arginase inhibitor. RBCs were co-incubated with rat aortic segments for 18h followed by evaluation of endothelium-dependent (EDR) and -independent relaxation (EIDR) in isolated organ chambers. In vivo EDV, but not EIDV, was significantly impaired in patients with T2DM compared with patients with T1DM. Arginase inhibition resulted in improved EDV only in T2DM. RBCs from patients with T2DM induced impaired EDR but not EIDR in isolated aortic segments, whereas RBCs from patients with T1DM did not affect EDR nor EIDR. The present study demonstrates markedly impaired EDV in patients with T2DM in comparison with T1DM. In addition, it highlights the divergent roles of RBCs and arginase in mediating endothelial dysfunction in T1DM and T2DM. While endothelial dysfunction is mediated via RBCs and arginase in T2DM, these phenomena are not prominent in T1DM thereby indicating distinct differences in underlying mechanisms.

摘要

1 型和 2 型糖尿病(T1DM 和 T2DM)患者内皮功能障碍的机制尚不清楚。红细胞(RBC)中精氨酸酶活性的增加可诱导 T2DM 患者的内皮功能障碍,但 RBC 的影响以及精氨酸酶抑制在 T1DM 中的作用尚未得到探索。我们旨在研究 T1DM 和 T2DM 患者的内皮功能差异,重点关注 RBC 和精氨酸酶。纳入了 13 名 T1DM 患者和 26 名 T2DM 患者,这些患者在 HbA1c 和性别方面相匹配。通过静脉闭塞体积描记术,在给予精氨酸酶抑制剂前后评估了体内内皮依赖性(EDV)和非依赖性(EIDV)血管扩张。将 RBC 与大鼠主动脉段共孵育 18 小时,然后在分离的器官室中评估内皮依赖性(EDR)和非依赖性松弛(EIDR)。与 T1DM 患者相比,T2DM 患者的体内 EDV 明显受损,但 EIDV 无差异。精氨酸酶抑制仅在 T2DM 中改善 EDV。来自 T2DM 患者的 RBC 诱导了离体主动脉段的 EDR 受损,但不影响 EIDR,而来自 T1DM 患者的 RBC 既不影响 EDR 也不影响 EIDR。本研究表明,与 T1DM 相比,T2DM 患者的 EDV 明显受损。此外,它还强调了 RBC 和精氨酸酶在介导 T1DM 和 T2DM 内皮功能障碍中的不同作用。虽然 RBC 和精氨酸酶介导了 T2DM 中的内皮功能障碍,但这些现象在 T1DM 中并不明显,这表明潜在机制存在明显差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8891/11300671/a676c963975e/cs-138-cs20240447-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验