Suppr超能文献

老年患者与年轻患者下颌第三磨牙拔除的原因和并发症是否存在差异?

Are There Differences in the Causes and Complications of Mandibular Third Molar Extraction in Older Patients Compared to Younger Patients?

机构信息

Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Nov;82(11):1416-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.182. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although most impacted third molars (ITMs) are extracted in the teens and early 20s, some undergo extractions after their 40s. It is unclear whether the reasons for extraction, the degree of impaction, and complications differ in patients in an older age group compared with a younger age group.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the association between age and 1) reason for extraction and 2) postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone surgical extraction of at least one mandibular ITM at a single institution. We excluded 1) age under 20 years, 2) follow-up period of less than 1 week, and 3) tooth extraction under general anesthesia.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The primary predictor variable was age, classified into 3 groups (20s:20-29; 30s:30-39; over 40s: 40 and greater).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variables were the reason for extraction (prophylactic or symptomatic) and the presence of complications. The secondary outcome variable was type of complication (postoperative infection, dry socket, neurosensory disturbance, presenting pain over 1 month, retained root requiring secondary treatment).

COVARIATES

The covariates were sex, laterality of ITM, and difficulty of extraction as measured by the difficulty index, a measure based on depth, orientation, and ramus relationship/space available, with a higher score indicating greater difficulty.

ANALYSES

χ test was performed to analyze the association of categorical outcome variables and covariates. Level of statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Of a total of 831 eligible subjects, there were 555 (66.8%), 159 (19.1%), and 117 (14.1%) in the 20s, 30s, and over 40s age groups, respectively. The percentage of symptomatic extraction of ITM was significantly higher in the over-40 age group compared with the 20s group (92.3 vs 69.4%, (P < .001). Complication rate also significantly differed between over 40s group and the 20s group (7.7 vs 1.8%, P < .001). Difficulty index and indications for ITM extraction were significantly different between groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Symptoms, difficulty, and complications related to ITM increase at over 40 years of age. This should be taken into consideration during the joint clinical decision-making process with patients with ITM.

摘要

背景

尽管大多数受影响的第三磨牙(ITM)在十几岁和二十出头时被拔除,但有些则在四十多岁后被拔除。目前尚不清楚与年龄较小的患者相比,年龄较大的患者在拔牙的原因、阻生程度和并发症方面是否存在差异。

目的

本研究旨在衡量年龄与 1)拔牙原因和 2)术后并发症之间的关联。

研究设计、地点和样本:这是一项对单家医疗机构接受至少一颗下颌 ITM 手术拔除的患者进行的回顾性队列研究。我们排除了 1)年龄低于 20 岁、2)随访期少于 1 周、3)全身麻醉下拔牙的患者。

预测变量

主要预测变量是年龄,分为 3 组(20 多岁:20-29 岁;30 多岁:30-39 岁;40 岁以上:40 岁及以上)。

主要结局变量

主要结局变量是拔牙原因(预防性或症状性)和并发症的存在。次要结局变量是并发症类型(术后感染、干槽症、神经感觉障碍、1 个月以上的持续性疼痛、需要二次治疗的残留根)。

协变量

协变量为性别、ITM 的偏侧性以及拔牙难度,这是通过拔牙难度指数来衡量的,该指数基于深度、方向和分支关系/可用空间,得分越高表示难度越大。

分析

采用 χ 检验分析分类结局变量和协变量的相关性。统计学显著性水平设定为 P<.05。

结果

在总共 831 名合格的受试者中,20 多岁、30 多岁和 40 岁以上年龄组分别有 555 名(66.8%)、159 名(19.1%)和 117 名(14.1%)。与 20 多岁组相比,40 岁以上组 ITM 症状性拔牙的比例显著更高(92.3%比 69.4%,P<.001)。并发症发生率在 40 岁以上组与 20 多岁组之间也存在显著差异(7.7%比 1.8%,P<.001)。各组间拔牙难度指数和 ITM 拔除指征差异均有统计学意义(P<.001)。

结论和相关性

40 岁以上患者与 ITM 相关的症状、难度和并发症增加。在与 ITM 患者进行联合临床决策时应考虑到这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验