• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居住地的地理位置、产妇的种族和民族与获得生殖遗传服务的机会存在差异。

Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity.

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Reproductive Genetics, University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599.

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2024 Nov;26(11):101221. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101221. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101221
PMID:39045791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11560621/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the association between geographic location of residence and use of aneuploidy screening or prenatal genetic counseling and how it is modified by maternal race and ethnicity.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of individuals at a tertiary care center between 2017-2019. County of residence was classified as rural or metropolitan based in US Office of Management and Budget 2019 definitions. Maternal race and ethnicity were self-identified. Our composite outcome was defined as use of aneuploidy screening or genetic counseling visit. The composite outcome was compared by geographic location and ethnicity. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between geographic location and the composite outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 8774 pregnancies were included. Of these, 4770 (54%) had genetic screening, and 3781 (43%) had at least 1 genetic counseling visit. Rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers (37.1% vs 47.2%, P < .001). In addition, we identified differences in the composite outcome between White rural patients and LatinX rural patients (37.7% vs 35.6%, P < .001) and between Asian rural patients and LatinX and Black rural patients (41.0% vs 35.6%, P < .001; 41.0% vs 36.8%, P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that rural patients were significantly less likely to have the composite outcome compared with metropolitan peers, after adjusting for LatinX ethnicity and gestational age at first prenatal visit (OR 0.72, [0.55, 0.95], P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Rural, minority patients were significantly less likely to receive reproductive genetic services compared with metropolitan peers extending our knowledge of disparities in maternity care.

摘要

目的

描述居住地理位置与非整倍体筛查或产前遗传咨询的使用之间的关系,并探讨其如何受产妇种族和民族的影响。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2017 年至 2019 年期间在一家三级保健中心就诊的个体。根据美国管理和预算办公室 2019 年的定义,将居住地所在县分为农村或大都市。产妇种族和民族为自我认定。我们的复合结局定义为使用非整倍体筛查或遗传咨询就诊。通过地理位置和民族比较复合结局。使用逻辑回归模型来分析地理位置与复合结局之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 8774 例妊娠。其中,4770 例(54%)接受了遗传筛查,3781 例(43%)至少接受了 1 次遗传咨询。与大都市患者相比,农村患者发生复合结局的可能性显著降低(37.1%比 47.2%,P<0.001)。此外,我们还发现白种人农村患者与拉丁裔农村患者(37.7%比 35.6%,P<0.001)以及亚洲农村患者与拉丁裔和黑种人农村患者(41.0%比 35.6%,P<0.001;41.0%比 36.8%,P<0.001)之间存在复合结局的差异。逻辑回归表明,在校正了拉丁裔民族和首次产前就诊时的孕龄后,农村患者发生复合结局的可能性显著低于大都市患者(比值比 0.72,[0.55,0.95],P=0.002)。

结论

与大都市患者相比,农村少数民族患者接受生殖遗传服务的可能性显著降低,这进一步加深了我们对孕产妇保健差异的认识。

相似文献

1
Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity.居住地的地理位置、产妇的种族和民族与获得生殖遗传服务的机会存在差异。
Genet Med. 2024 Nov;26(11):101221. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101221. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
2
Evaluating for disparities in prenatal genetic counseling.评估产前遗传咨询中的差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100494. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100494. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
3
Racial and Ethnic and Rural Variations in the Use of Hybrid Prenatal Care in the US.美国混合式产前护理使用情况中的种族、民族及农村差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449243. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49243.
4
Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity.按种族和民族划分的育龄妇女获得关键产科护理的地理可达性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):304.e1-304.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.042. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Joint effect of race/ethnicity or location of residence and sex on low density lipoprotein-cholesterol among veterans with type 2 diabetes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.种族/民族或居住地和性别对 2 型糖尿病退伍军人中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的联合影响:一项 10 年回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01730-8.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
7
Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.城乡和种族-民族之间对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认识差异。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5190-6.
8
Urban-rural differences in pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2016.城乡间与妊娠相关的死亡差异,美国,2011-2016 年。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):183.e1-183.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Examining racial and ethnic disparities in diagnosis and access to care in infantile atopic dermatitis in the USA: a retrospective cohort study.美国婴儿特应性皮炎诊断及医疗服务获取方面的种族和民族差异研究:一项回顾性队列研究
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Dec 23;192(1):144-151. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae322.
10
Investigation of health inequities in maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients with placenta accreta spectrum: a multicenter study.胎盘植入谱系疾病患者母婴结局健康不平等的调查:一项多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jul;6(7):101386. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101386. Epub 2024 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
"We really are seeing racism in the hospitals": Racial identity, racism, and doula care for diverse populations in Georgia.“我们在医院里确实看到了种族主义”:种族认同、种族主义和佐治亚州多样化人群的导乐护理。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 7;18(6):e0286663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286663. eCollection 2023.
2
Statewide assessment of telehealth use for obstetrical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.全州范围内评估 COVID-19 大流行期间产科护理中的远程医疗使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100941. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
一般风险人群胎儿染色体异常的无创产前筛查(NIPS):美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)基于证据的临床指南。
Genet Med. 2023 Feb;25(2):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review.拉丁裔对遗传咨询和检测的态度、障碍和体验:系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):166-181. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1632. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Prevalence of Access to Prenatal Care in the First Trimester of Pregnancy Among Black Women Compared to Other Races/Ethnicities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与其他种族/族裔相比,黑人女性孕期头三个月获得产前护理的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Public Health Rev. 2022 Jul 4;43:1604400. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604400. eCollection 2022.
6
Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.在进行产前基因诊断时,对染色体微阵列的接受程度存在差异。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(5):611-616. doi: 10.1002/pd.6109. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Evaluating for disparities in prenatal genetic counseling.评估产前遗传咨询中的差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100494. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100494. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
OB/GYN residents' training, attitudes, and comfort level regarding genetics.妇产科住院医师的培训、态度和对遗传学的舒适程度。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2871-2880. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02310-1. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
The 2019 US medical genetics workforce: a focus on clinical genetics.2019 年美国医学遗传学劳动力:聚焦临床遗传学。
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1458-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01162-5. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 大流行对孕产妇和围产期结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e759-e772. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00079-6. Epub 2021 Mar 31.