National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 6;58(31):13737-13747. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c02589. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
A model was developed to conduct techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for reactive carbon capture (RCC) and conversion of carbon dioxide (CO) to methanol. This RCC process is compared to a baseline commercialized flue gas CO hydrogenation process. An ASPEN model was combined with existing TEA and LCA models into a larger TEA/LCA framework in Python. From preliminary experimental data, the model found a levelized cost of $0.79/kg methanol for the baseline process and $0.99/kg for the RCC process. The cradle-to-gate carbon intensity of the baseline process was 0.50 kg-COe/kg-methanol, compared to 0.55 kg-COe/kg-methanol for the RCC process. However, water consumption for RCC (10.21 kg-HO/kg-methanol) is greatly reduced compared to the baseline (12.89 kg-HO/kg-methanol). Future improvements in hydrogen electrolysis costs will benefit the RCC. A target H/methanol mass ratio of 0.26 was developed for RCC laboratory experiments to reduce methanol cost below the baseline. If a ratio of 0.24 can be achieved, a levelized cost of $0.76/kg methanol is projected, with a carbon intensity of 0.42 kg-COe/kg-methanol.
开发了一个模型来进行技术经济分析(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA),以用于反应性碳捕获(RCC)和二氧化碳(CO)转化为甲醇。将此 RCC 工艺与基线商业化的烟道气 CO 加氢工艺进行比较。使用 ASPEN 模型并结合现有的 TEA 和 LCA 模型,在 Python 中构建了一个更大的 TEA/LCA 框架。根据初步的实验数据,该模型发现基线工艺的甲醇平准化成本为 0.79 美元/千克,而 RCC 工艺为 0.99 美元/千克。基线工艺的摇篮到大门碳强度为 0.50 kg-COe/kg-甲醇,而 RCC 工艺为 0.55 kg-COe/kg-甲醇。然而,与基线相比,RCC 的水耗(10.21 kg-HO/kg-甲醇)大大降低。未来氢气电解成本的降低将有利于 RCC。为 RCC 实验室实验开发了一个目标 H/甲醇质量比为 0.26,以将甲醇成本降低到基线以下。如果可以实现 0.24 的比例,则预计甲醇平准化成本为 0.76 美元/千克,碳强度为 0.42 kg-COe/kg-甲醇。