• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

**采访寻求庇护的儿童:为最佳实践提供信息的研究范围综述**

Interviewing Asylum-Seeking Children: A Scoping Review of Research to Inform Best Practices.

机构信息

McGill University, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3680-3695. doi: 10.1177/15248380241260014. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1177/15248380241260014
PMID:39049444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11545363/
Abstract

Immigration interviews with asylum-seeking youth have been largely understudied. In domestic legal settings, children interviewed about abuse and maltreatment provide more detailed, relevant responses when asked open-ended questions and when interviewed in a neutral environment, among other supportive practices. In asylum settings, guidance for interviews with youth derives from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is not clear to what extent best practices are employed during asylum interviews with youth. This scoping review was performed to (a) provide an overview of empirical literature on interviews with children in immigration settings, including border screenings, interviews with representatives, and asylum hearings, (b) explore whether best practices derived from forensic psychology and children's rights are observed in asylum interviews, (c) identify unique interview needs of asylum-seeking youth, and (d) derive implications for research and practice. A scoping review of three databases conducted in October 2023 yielded titles, of which 29 articles met inclusion criteria. These comprised quantitative and qualitative studies in English from 2003 to 2023. Three articles identified were quantitative, and 26 were qualitative. While several articles touched on interview practices and youth's experiences of interviews, only a few examined how asylum-seeking youth responded to different interview factors such as question type and interview setting. Key findings highlight inconsistent application of best practice principles, and several areas where best practices to support asylum-seeking children require clarification through further research.

摘要

移民面试中对寻求庇护的青年关注较少。在国内法律环境下,当儿童被问及虐待问题时,采用开放式问题和中立环境进行访谈,以及其他支持性措施,他们会提供更详细、更相关的回应。在庇护环境中,对青年的访谈指南来自《联合国儿童权利公约》。目前尚不清楚在庇护面试中多大程度上采用了最佳实践。本范围界定审查旨在:(a) 概述移民环境中对儿童的访谈的实证文献,包括边境筛查、代表访谈和庇护听证;(b) 探讨从法医心理学和儿童权利中得出的最佳实践是否在庇护面试中得到遵守;(c) 确定寻求庇护青年的独特面试需求;(d) 为研究和实践提供启示。2023 年 10 月对三个数据库进行的范围界定审查产生了标题,其中 29 篇文章符合纳入标准。这些文章包括 2003 年至 2023 年期间用英语进行的定量和定性研究。其中有三篇文章为定量研究,26 篇为定性研究。虽然有几篇文章涉及访谈实践和青年对访谈的体验,但只有少数文章探讨了寻求庇护的青年如何对不同的访谈因素(如问题类型和访谈环境)做出反应。主要发现强调了最佳实践原则的应用不一致,并且有几个领域需要通过进一步研究来澄清支持寻求庇护儿童的最佳实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c593/11545363/16176f3a841e/10.1177_15248380241260014-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c593/11545363/16176f3a841e/10.1177_15248380241260014-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c593/11545363/16176f3a841e/10.1177_15248380241260014-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Interviewing Asylum-Seeking Children: A Scoping Review of Research to Inform Best Practices.**采访寻求庇护的儿童:为最佳实践提供信息的研究范围综述**
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3680-3695. doi: 10.1177/15248380241260014. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A scoping review on arts-based interventions for the mental health of refugee and asylum-seeking children and youth.一项关于基于艺术的干预措施对难民及寻求庇护儿童和青少年心理健康影响的范围综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2025 Jul;145(4):209-219. doi: 10.1177/17579139251353431. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
4
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
"Living Independently Means Everything to Me": The Voice of Australian Autistic Adults.“独立生活对我来说意味着一切”:澳大利亚成年自闭症患者的心声。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):312-320. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0102. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
10
Autism and bilingualism: A thematic analysis of practitioner perspectives in the United Kingdom.自闭症与双语:英国从业者观点的主题分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):205-222. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12939. Epub 2023 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Upholding the right to health of forcibly displaced children in Europe.维护欧洲被迫流离失所儿童的健康权。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Jul 7;10:100641. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100641. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The Utility of the Birthday Prompt in Narrative Practice with Maltreated and Non-maltreated 4- to 9-year-old Children.生日提示在对受虐待和未受虐待的4至9岁儿童进行叙事实践中的作用
Appl Dev Sci. 2022;26(4):679-688. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2021.1963729. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
2
Lawyers' experience questioning children in Canadian court.律师在加拿大法庭上讯问儿童的经验。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Dec;134:105930. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105930. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
3
Do children unintentionally report maltreatment? Comparison of disclosures of neglect versus sexual abuse.
儿童是否会无意间报告虐待?忽视与性虐待披露的比较。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Nov;133:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105824. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
Pseudotemporal Invitations: 6- to 9-year-Old Maltreated Children's Tendency to Misinterpret Invitations Referencing "Time" as Solely Requesting Conventional Temporal Information.虚假时间邀请:6 至 9 岁受虐儿童倾向于将提及“时间”的邀请误解为仅请求传统时间信息。
Child Maltreat. 2023 May;28(2):265-274. doi: 10.1177/10775595221104829. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
6
Don't know responding in young maltreated children: The effects of wh- questions type and enhanced interview instructions.不知道如何回应受虐儿童:wh-问题类型和增强型访谈指令的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;45(2):124-137. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000404.
7
Imprecision About Body Mechanics When Child Witnesses Are Questioned About Sexual Abuse.儿童性虐待案件询问中对身体力学的不精确把握。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP12375-NP12397. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997941. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
8
Meta-analysis of the effects of two interviewing practices on children's disclosures of sensitive information: Rapport practices and question type.对两种访谈实践对儿童披露敏感信息的影响的元分析:亲和实践和问题类型。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Mar;113:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.104930. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
10
The prevalence of mental illness in refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.难民和寻求庇护者中心理疾病的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003337. eCollection 2020 Sep.