Factors Contributing to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterised by a reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR) or an increased index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), has received considerable attention as a cause of chest pain in recent years. However, the risks and causes of CMD remain unclear; therefore, effective treatment strategies have not yet been established. Heart failure or coronary artery disease (CAD) is a risk factor for CMD, with a higher prevalence among women. However, the other contributing factors remain unclear. In this study, we assessed the risk in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), excluding those with heart failure or organic stenosis of the coronary arteries. Furthermore, we analysed whether the risk of CMD differed according to component factors and sex.

METHODS

This study included 84 patients with ANOCA (36 men and 48 women; mean age, 63 years) who underwent coronary angiography and functional testing (CFT). The CFT included a spasm provocation test (SPT), followed by a coronary microvascular function test (CMVF). In the SPT, patients were mainly provoked by acetylcholine (ACh), and coronary spasm was defined as >90% transient coronary artery constriction on coronary angiography, accompanied by chest pain or ischaemic changes on electrocardiography. In 15 patients (18%) with negative ACh provocation, ergonovine maleate (EM) was administered as an additional provocative drug. In the CMVF, a pressure wire was inserted into the left anterior descending coronary artery using intravenous adenosine triphosphate, and the CFR and IMR were measured using previously described methods. A CFR < 2.0 or IMR ≥ 25 was indicative of CMD. The correlations between various laboratory indices and CMD and its components were investigated, and logistic regression analysis was performed, focusing on factors where < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients, a CFR < 2.0 was found in 22 (26%) and an IMR ≥ 25 in 40 (48%) patients, with CMD identified in 46 (55%) patients. CMD was correlated with smoking ( = 0.020) and the use of EM ( = 0.020). The factors that correlated with a CFR < 2.0 included the echocardiograph index E/e' ( = 0.013), which showed a weak but positive correlation with the CFR (r = 0.268, = 0.013). Conversely, the factors correlated with an IMR ≥ 25 included RAS inhibitor usage ( = 0.018) and smoking ( = 0.042). Assessment of the risk of CMD according to sex revealed that smoking ( = 0.036) was the only factor associated with CMD in men, whereas the left ventricular mass index ( = 0.010) and low glycated haemoglobin levels ( = 0.012) were associated with CMD in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that smoking status and EM use were associated with CMD. The risk of CMD differed between the two CMD components and sex. Although these factors should be considered when treating CMD, smoking cessation remains important. In addition, CMD assessment should be performed carefully when EM is used after ACh provocation. Further validation of our findings using prospective studies and large registries is warranted.