Suppr超能文献

在择期结直肠手术中使用电动圆形吻合器后吻合口漏的发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。

Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5541-5546. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11082-5. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the anastomotic leak rates between powered and manual circular staplers in elective left-sided colorectal resections.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of elective left-sided colorectal resections before and after implementation of a powered circular stapler at a tertiary care center was conducted. The manual stapler group consisted of consecutive resections performed between January 2016 to December 2016 and the powered stapler group, between September 2021 and December 2022. Primary outcome was 30-day anastomotic leak rate. A chi-squared analysis was performed to compare anastomotic leak rates. Factors associated with anastomotic leak were examined.

RESULTS

Two-hundred forty-seven patients were included: 154 in the manual stapler group and 93 in the powered stapler group. Mean (SD) age was 60 (15) years old, 37.7% were female and 72.9% of resections were performed for malignancy. Both groups had similar patient characteristics and surgical technique. Overall leak rate was 2.0% in the manual stapler group and 10.8% in the powered stapler group. The powered staplers were found to have 6.06 times the odds of leak compared to manual staplers (95% CI, 1.62-22.65; p = 0.01). None of the other factors were found to be associated with anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had left-sided colorectal anastomosis had higher anastomotic leak rates with powered compared to manual circular staplers. This finding is contrary to previous retrospective studies that found lower leak rates with powered staplers.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较电动和手动圆形吻合器在择期左半结直肠切除术中的吻合口漏发生率。

方法

对一家三级保健中心实施电动圆形吻合器前后的择期左半结直肠切除术进行回顾性队列研究。手动吻合器组包括 2016 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月连续进行的切除术,而电动吻合器组包括 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月进行的切除术。主要结局为 30 天吻合口漏发生率。采用卡方分析比较吻合口漏发生率。检查与吻合口漏相关的因素。

结果

共纳入 247 例患者:手动吻合器组 154 例,电动吻合器组 93 例。平均(SD)年龄为 60(15)岁,女性占 37.7%,72.9%的手术为恶性肿瘤。两组患者的一般特征和手术技术相似。手动吻合器组的总体漏诊率为 2.0%,电动吻合器组为 10.8%。与手动吻合器相比,电动吻合器发生漏诊的几率高 6.06 倍(95%CI,1.62-22.65;p=0.01)。没有其他因素与吻合口漏相关。

结论

与手动圆形吻合器相比,接受左半结直肠吻合术的患者使用电动吻合器时吻合口漏发生率更高。这一发现与之前发现电动吻合器漏诊率较低的回顾性研究结果相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验