Suppr超能文献

数字版指南对精神分裂症指南知识的影响:一项多中心整群随机对照试验的结果。

The impact of a digital guideline version on schizophrenia guideline knowledge: results from a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Augsburg, Medical Faculty, BKH Augsburg, Geschwister-Schönert-Str. 1, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Medical Faculty, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Jul 29;22(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03533-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines are crucial for enhancing healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Yet, their implementation remains inconsistent across various professions and disciplines. Previous findings on the implementation of the German guideline for schizophrenia (2019) revealed low adherence rates among healthcare professionals. Barriers to guideline adherence are multifaceted, influenced by individual, contextual, and guideline-related factors. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a digital guideline version compared to print/PDF formats in enhancing guideline adherence.

METHODS

A multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in South Bavaria, Germany, involving psychologists and physicians. Participants were divided into two groups: implementation of the guideline using a digital online version via the MAGICapp platform and the other using the traditional print/PDF version. The study included a baseline assessment and a post-intervention assessment following a 6-month intervention phase. The primary outcome was guideline knowledge, which was assessed using a guideline knowledge questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study included 217 participants at baseline and 120 at post-intervention. Both groups showed significant improvements in guideline knowledge; however, no notable difference was found between both study groups regarding guideline knowledge at either time points. At baseline, 43.6% in the control group (CG) and 52.5% of the interventional group (IG) met the criterion. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups at either time point (T0: Chi = 1.65, p = 0.199, T1: Chi = 0.34, p = 0.561). At post-intervention, both groups improved, with 58.2% in the CG and 63.5% in the IG meeting this criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

While the study did not include a control group without any implementation strategy, the overall improvement in guideline knowledge following an implementation strategy, independent of the format, was confirmed. The digital guideline version, while not superior in enhancing knowledge, showed potential benefits in shared decision-making skills. However, familiarity with traditional formats and various barriers to digital application may have influenced these results. The study highlights the importance of tailored implementation strategies, especially for younger healthcare providers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028895.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南对于提高医疗质量和患者结局至关重要。然而,不同专业和学科之间的实施情况仍然不一致。先前关于德国精神分裂症指南(2019 年)实施情况的研究结果表明,医疗保健专业人员的依从率较低。指南依从的障碍是多方面的,受到个人、环境和指南相关因素的影响。本研究旨在调查数字版指南与印刷/PDF 格式相比在提高指南依从性方面的效果。

方法

在德国南巴伐利亚州进行了一项多中心、集群随机对照试验,涉及心理学家和医生。参与者分为两组:使用 MAGICapp 平台实施指南的数字在线版本和使用传统印刷/PDF 版本实施指南。研究包括基线评估和 6 个月干预阶段后的干预后评估。主要结局是使用指南知识问卷评估的指南知识。

结果

研究包括基线时的 217 名参与者和干预后时的 120 名参与者。两组的指南知识都有显著提高;然而,两组在两个时间点的指南知识方面均无显著差异。基线时,对照组(CG)中有 43.6%,干预组(IG)中有 52.5%符合标准。两组在两个时间点的主要结局均无显著差异(T0:Chi=1.65,p=0.199,T1:Chi=0.34,p=0.561)。干预后,两组均有所改善,CG 中有 58.2%,IG 中有 63.5%符合标准。

结论

尽管该研究没有包括没有实施策略的对照组,但在实施策略后,指南知识的总体提高得到了确认,而与格式无关。数字版指南虽然在提高知识方面没有优势,但在共享决策技能方面显示出了潜在的好处。然而,对传统格式的熟悉程度和数字应用的各种障碍可能影响了这些结果。该研究强调了制定个性化实施策略的重要性,特别是针对年轻的医疗保健提供者。

试验注册

https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00028895。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f09/11287881/f83c42206eab/12916_2024_3533_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验