Suppr超能文献

研究在饮食干预研究中,主要纤维对丁酸生成潜力的响应。

Investigating the response of the butyrate production potential to major fibers in dietary intervention studies.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024 Jul 30;10(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00533-5.

Abstract

Interventions involving dietary fibers are known to benefit host health. A leading contribution of gut microbiota is commonly recognized with production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) suspected to play a key role. However, the detailed mechanisms are largely unknown, and apart from a well-described bifidogenic effect of some fibers, results for other bacterial taxa are often incongruent between studies. We performed pooled analyses of 16S rRNA gene data derived from intervention studies (n = 14) based on three fibers, namely, inulin-type fructans (ITF), resistant starch (RS), and arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS), harmonizing the bioinformatics workflow to reveal taxa stimulated by those substrates, specifically focusing on the SCFA-production potential. The results showed an increased butyrate production potential after ITF (p < 0.05) and RS (p < 0.1) treatment via an increase in bacteria exhibiting the enzyme butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase (but) that was governed by Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes (ITF) and Agathobacter (RS) respectively. AXOS did not promote an increase in butyrate producers, nor were pathways linked to propionate production stimulated by any intervention. A bifidogenic effect was observed for AXOS and ITF, which was only partly associated with the behavior of but-containing bacteria and largely represented a separate response. Low and high Ruminococcus abundances pre-intervention for ITF and RS, respectively, promoted an increase in but-containing taxa (p < 0.05) upon interventions, whereas initial Prevotella abundance was negatively associated with responses of butyrate producers for both fibers. Collectively, our data demonstrate targeted stimulation of specific taxa by individual fibers increasing the potential to synthesize butyrate, where gut microbiota composition pre-intervention strongly controlled outcomes.

摘要

膳食纤维干预被认为有益于宿主健康。肠道微生物群的一个主要贡献是普遍被认为产生短链脂肪酸 (SCFA),这些脂肪酸被怀疑在其中发挥关键作用。然而,其详细机制在很大程度上尚不清楚,除了一些纤维具有很好描述的双歧杆菌效应外,其他细菌分类群的结果在不同研究之间往往不一致。我们对基于三种纤维(菊粉型果聚糖 (ITF)、抗性淀粉 (RS) 和阿拉伯木聚糖寡糖 (AXOS) 的干预研究的 16S rRNA 基因数据进行了汇总分析(n=14),协调了生物信息学工作流程以揭示受这些底物刺激的分类群,特别是专注于 SCFA 产生潜力。结果表明,ITF(p<0.05)和 RS(p<0.1)处理后丁酸产生潜力增加,这是通过增加具有丁酸酰基辅酶 A:乙酸辅酶 A 转移酶 (but) 的细菌来实现的,而这种细菌分别由 Faecalibacterium、Anaerostipes (ITF) 和 Agathobacter (RS) 控制。AXOS 并未促进丁酸产生菌的增加,也没有任何干预措施刺激与丙酸产生相关的途径。AXOS 和 ITF 观察到双歧杆菌效应,这仅部分与含 but 细菌的行为相关,并且主要代表单独的反应。ITF 和 RS 干预前低和高 Ruminococcus 丰度分别促进干预后含 but 分类群的增加(p<0.05),而初始 Prevotella 丰度与两种纤维的丁酸产生菌的反应呈负相关。总的来说,我们的数据表明,个体纤维对特定分类群的靶向刺激增加了合成丁酸的潜力,其中干预前的肠道微生物群组成强烈控制了结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7e2/11289085/f8e45dd11c4e/41522_2024_533_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验