Bent Catherine A, Aulich Alexandra, Constantine Christos, Fidock Esther, Dwyer Patrick, Green Cherie, Smith Jodie, Gurba Ava N, Harrington Lucas T, Gore Katherine E, Rabba Aspasia Stacey, Ayton Lauren N, Fordyce Kathryn, Green Jonathan, Jellett Rachel, Kennedy Lyndel J, MacDuffie Katherine E, Meera Shoba S, Watson Linda R, Whitehouse Andrew Jo, Hudry Kristelle
La Trobe University, Australia.
University of California, Davis, USA.
Autism. 2025 Sep;29(9):2282-2296. doi: 10.1177/13623613241262077. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Emerging evidence suggests parenting supports implemented in the first 2 years of life may influence developmental outcomes for infants more likely to be Autistic. Yet questions remain about acceptability of these supports to the Autistic and autism communities. Through mixed-methods participatory research - co-designed and produced by Autistic and non-Autistic researchers - we sought diverse community perspectives on this topic, including to understand the relative acceptability of different support options. A total of 238 participants completed our online survey: 128 Autistic and 110 non-Autistic respondents, some of whom also self-identified as parents of Autistic, otherwise neurodivergent, and/or neurotypical children, and/or as health/education professionals and/or researchers. Most participants agreed that very-early-in-life approaches should help parents understand and support their children, and disagreed that these should seek to suppress autistic behaviour. Most agreed with the goal of respecting infant autonomy, and that parent education towards creating sensitive, accommodating environments could be appropriate, albeit with nuanced differences-of-opinion regarding the acceptability of specific therapeutic approaches. Participants generally endorsed the terms 'support' (vs 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (vs 'at-risk'/'pre-emptive'). Engaging equal-power partnerships for the development, delivery of, and discourse around early-in-life autism supports will ensure end-user community values and needs are respected.Lay abstractMost support programmes for Autistic children are available only after they are diagnosed. Research suggests that parenting supports may be helpful for parents and their infants, when provided in the first 2 years of life - before a formal diagnosis is given, but when information suggests an infant is more likely to be Autistic. However, we do not know how acceptable these types of supports might be to the Autistic and autism communities. We asked 238 Autistic and non-autistic people - some of whom were parents, and some of whom were professionals working in research, health and education - about their perspectives on very-early supports. People generally agreed that it could be acceptable to work with parents to help them understand and support their child's specific needs and unique ways of communicating. People suggested a variety of support strategies could be acceptable, including parent education, changing the environment to meet an infant's needs, and creating opportunities for infants' to make choices and exercise control. People preferred respectful and accurate language - including the term 'support' (rather than 'intervention') and 'early-in-life' (rather than 'at-risk' of autism, or 'pre-emptive' when describing developmental stage). Continuing to work with community members will help to make sure autism support programmes are relevant and helpful.
新出现的证据表明,在生命的头两年实施的育儿支持措施可能会对更易患自闭症的婴儿的发育结果产生影响。然而,这些支持措施对自闭症患者及其社区的可接受性仍然存在疑问。通过由自闭症和非自闭症研究人员共同设计和开展的混合方法参与式研究,我们就这一主题征求了不同的社区观点,包括了解不同支持选项的相对可接受性。共有238名参与者完成了我们的在线调查:128名自闭症患者和110名非自闭症受访者,其中一些人还自称是自闭症、其他神经发育差异或神经典型儿童的父母,以及/或者是健康/教育专业人员和/或研究人员。大多数参与者一致认为,生命早期的方法应该帮助父母理解并支持他们的孩子,不同意这些方法旨在抑制自闭症行为。大多数人同意尊重婴儿自主性的目标,并且认为针对营造敏感、包容环境的家长教育可能是合适的,尽管对于特定治疗方法的可接受性存在细微的意见分歧。参与者普遍认可“支持”(而非“干预”)和“生命早期”(而非“有风险”/“先发制人”)这些术语。建立平等权力的伙伴关系来开展、提供和讨论生命早期的自闭症支持措施,将确保最终用户社区的价值观和需求得到尊重。
大多数针对自闭症儿童的支持项目只有在他们被诊断之后才会提供。研究表明,在正式诊断之前,但当有信息表明婴儿更易患自闭症时,在生命头两年提供育儿支持可能对父母及其婴儿有帮助。然而,我们不知道这类支持措施对自闭症患者及其社区的可接受程度如何。我们询问了238名自闭症和非自闭症患者——其中一些是父母,一些是从事研究、健康和教育工作的专业人员——关于他们对生命早期支持的看法。人们普遍认为,与父母合作以帮助他们理解并支持孩子的特定需求和独特沟通方式可能是可以接受的。人们认为多种支持策略可能是可以接受的,包括家长教育、改变环境以满足婴儿需求,以及为婴儿创造做出选择和行使控制权的机会。人们更喜欢尊重和准确的语言——包括“支持”一词(而非“干预”)和“生命早期”(而非自闭症“有风险”,或在描述发育阶段时的“先发制人”)。继续与社区成员合作将有助于确保自闭症支持项目具有相关性且有帮助。