Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01181-z.
While healthcare organizations in several countries are embracing Value-Based Health Care (VBHC), there are limited insights into how to achieve this paradigm shift. This study examines the decade-long (2012-2023) change towards VBHC in a pioneering Dutch university hospital.
Through retrospective, complexity-informed process research, we study how a Dutch university hospital's strategy to implement VBHC evolved, how implementation outcomes unfolded, and the underlying logic behind these developments. Data include the hospital's internal documents (n = 10,536), implementation outcome indicators (n = 4), a survey among clinicians (n = 47), and interviews with individuals contributing to VBHC at the hospital level (n = 20).
The change towards VBHC is characterized by three sequential strategies. Initially, the focus was on deep change through local, tailored implementation of multiple VBHC elements. The strategy then transitioned to a hospital-wide program aimed at evolutionary change on a large scale, emphasizing the integration of VBHC into mainstream IT and policies. Recognizing the advantages and limitations of both strategies, the hospital currently adopts a "hybrid" strategy. This strategy delicately combines deep and broad change efforts. The strategy evolved based on accumulated insights, contextual developments and shifts in decision-makers. The complexity of change was downplayed in plans and stakeholder communication. By the end of 2023, 68 (sub)departments engaged in VBHC, enabled to discuss patients' responses to Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) during outpatient care. However, clinicians' use of PROMs data showed limitations. While pioneers delved deeper into VBHC, laggards have yet to initiate it.
VBHC does not lend itself to linear planning and is not easily scalable. While there appears to be no golden standard for implementation, blending local and larger-scale actions appears advantageous. Local, deep yet harmonized and system-integrated changes culminate in large scale transformation. Embracing complexity and focusing on the ultimate aims of (re)institutionalization and (re)professionalization are crucial.
虽然许多国家的医疗保健组织都在采用基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC),但对于如何实现这种范式转变的了解有限。本研究考察了一家开创性的荷兰大学医院十年来(2012-2023 年)向 VBHC 转变的情况。
通过回顾性的、考虑复杂性的过程研究,我们研究了一家荷兰大学医院实施 VBHC 的战略是如何演变的,实施结果是如何展开的,以及这些发展背后的基本逻辑。数据包括医院的内部文件(n=10536)、实施结果指标(n=4)、对临床医生进行的调查(n=47)以及对在医院层面为 VBHC 做出贡献的个人进行的访谈(n=20)。
向 VBHC 的转变具有三个连续的战略特征。最初,重点是通过局部、量身定制的 VBHC 元素的实施进行深度变革。然后,该战略转变为旨在大规模进行渐进式变革的医院范围计划,强调将 VBHC 整合到主流 IT 和政策中。鉴于这两种策略的优势和局限性,医院目前采用了“混合”策略。这种策略巧妙地结合了深度和广泛的变革努力。该战略是基于积累的见解、背景发展和决策者的转变而演变的。变革的复杂性在计划和利益相关者沟通中被淡化了。到 2023 年底,68 个(分)部门参与了 VBHC,能够在门诊护理期间讨论患者对患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的反应。然而,临床医生使用 PROM 数据存在局限性。虽然先驱者更深入地研究了 VBHC,但落后者尚未开始实施。
VBHC 不适合线性规划,也不容易扩展。虽然实施似乎没有黄金标准,但混合本地和更大规模的行动似乎是有利的。局部、深入但协调一致和系统集成的变革最终导致了大规模的转型。拥抱复杂性并专注于(再)制度化和(再)专业化的最终目标至关重要。