Suppr超能文献

癌症治疗相关认知障碍干预措施在成年癌症幸存者中的比较效果:系统评价方案。

Comparative effectiveness of interventions for cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 5;13(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02602-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment-related cognitive impairment (CTRCI) can substantially reduce the quality of life of cancer survivors. Many treatments of CTRCI have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including psychological interventions, pharmacologic interventions, and other therapies. There is a pressing need to establish the benefits and harms of previously studied CTRCI treatments. The proposed systematic review and network meta-analyses will assess the relative efficacy and safety of competing interventions for the management of CTRCI.

METHODS

In consultation with the review team, an experienced medical information specialist will draft electronic search strategies for MEDLINE®, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Trials Registry. We will seek RCTs of interventions for the treatment of CTRCI in adults with any cancer, except cancers/metastases of the central nervous system. Due to the anticipated high search yields, dual independent screening of citations will be expedited by use of an artificial intelligence/machine learning tool. The co-primary outcomes of interest will be subjective and objective cognitive function. Secondary outcomes of interest will include measures of quality of life, mental and physical health symptoms, adherence to treatment, and harms (overall and treatment-related harms and harms associated with study withdrawal), where feasible, random-effects meta-analyses and network meta-analyses will be pursued. We will address the anticipated high clinical and methodological heterogeneity through meta-regressions, subgroup analyses, and/or sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION

The proposed systematic review will deliver a robust comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of existing therapies for the management of CTRCI. These findings will inform clinical decisions, identify evidence gaps, and identify promising therapies for future evaluation in RCTs.

摘要

背景

癌症治疗相关认知障碍(CTRCI)会显著降低癌症幸存者的生活质量。许多 CTRCI 的治疗方法已经在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行了评估,包括心理干预、药物干预和其他疗法。目前迫切需要确定先前研究的 CTRCI 治疗方法的益处和危害。拟议的系统评价和网络荟萃分析将评估竞争干预措施治疗 CTRCI 的相对疗效和安全性。

方法

与审查团队协商后,一名经验丰富的医学信息专家将起草用于 MEDLINE®、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 试验注册中心的电子搜索策略。我们将寻找针对成人任何癌症(中枢神经系统癌症/转移除外)的 CTRCI 治疗干预措施的 RCT。由于预计搜索结果会很高,因此将使用人工智能/机器学习工具加速双独立筛选引用。主要关注的联合结局将是主观和客观认知功能。次要结局将包括生活质量、心理和身体健康症状、治疗依从性以及危害(总体和与治疗相关的危害以及与研究退出相关的危害)的测量,在可行的情况下,将进行随机效应荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。我们将通过荟萃回归、亚组分析和/或敏感性分析来解决预期的高度临床和方法学异质性。

讨论

拟议的系统评价将对管理 CTRCI 的现有疗法的疗效和安全性进行全面评估。这些发现将为临床决策提供信息,确定证据空白,并确定有前途的疗法,以便在 RCT 中进一步评估。

相似文献

9
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.

本文引用的文献

6
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.2022 年癌症治疗和生存统计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Sep;72(5):409-436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验