Dunsmore Jennifer, Duncan Eilidh, MacLennan Sara, N'Dow James, MacLennan Steven
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K..
Health Service Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K.
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Aug 7;5(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00624-6.
/Aims De-implementation, including the removal or reduction of unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing, is crucial to ensure patients receive appropriate evidence-based health care. The utilization of de-implementation efforts is contingent on the quality of strategy reporting. To further understand effective ways to de-implement medical practices, specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies are required. This paper aims to critically analyse how well the behavioural targets and strategy components, in studies that focused on de-implementing unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing in secondary healthcare settings, were reported.
A supplementary analysis of studies included in a recently published review of de-implementation studies was conducted. Article text was coded verbatim to two established specification frameworks. Behavioural components were coded deductively to the five elements of the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. Strategy components were mapped to the nine elements of the Proctor's 'measuring implementation strategies' framework.
The behavioural components of low-value prescribing, as coded to the AACTT framework, were generally specified well. However, the Actor and Time components were often vague or not well reported. Specification of strategy components, as coded to the Proctor framework, were less well reported. Proctor's Actor, Action target: specifying targets, Dose and Justification elements were not well reported or varied in the amount of detail offered. We also offer suggestions of additional specifications to make, such as the 'interactions' participants have with a strategy.
Specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies for prescribing practices can be accommodated by the AACTT and Proctor frameworks when used in conjunction. These essential details are required to understand, replicate and successfully de-implement unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing. In general, standardisation in the reporting quality of these components is required to replicate any de-implementation efforts.
Not registered.
去实施,包括去除或减少不必要或不适当的处方,对于确保患者接受适当的循证医疗保健至关重要。去实施工作的成效取决于策略报告的质量。为了进一步了解去实施医疗实践的有效方法,需要明确去实施策略的行为目标和组成部分。本文旨在批判性地分析在专注于二级医疗环境中去除不必要或不适当处方的研究中,行为目标和策略组成部分的报告情况。
对最近发表的一项去实施研究综述中纳入的研究进行补充分析。文章文本逐字编码到两个既定的规范框架。行为组成部分通过演绎法编码到行动、行动者、背景、目标、时间(AACTT)框架的五个要素。策略组成部分映射到普罗克特的“测量实施策略”框架的九个要素。
按照AACTT框架编码的低价值处方行为组成部分通常明确得较好。然而,行动者和时间组成部分往往含糊不清或报告不佳。按照普罗克特框架编码的策略组成部分报告得较差。普罗克特的行动者、行动目标:明确目标、剂量和理由要素报告不佳或提供的详细程度各不相同。我们还提出了其他需要明确的建议,例如参与者与策略的“互动”。
在联合使用时,AACTT框架和普罗克特框架可用于明确去实施处方实践策略的行为目标和组成部分。理解、复制并成功去除不必要或不适当的处方需要这些关键细节。一般来说,为了复制任何去实施工作,这些组成部分的报告质量需要标准化。
未注册。