Suppr超能文献

了解坦桑尼亚农民对咨询服务的看法:主成分分析和Q方法的比较见解。

Understanding farmers' perceptions on advisory services in Tanzania: Comparative insights from principal component analysis and Q-methodology.

作者信息

Goodluck Annette, Otieno David Jakinda, Oluoch-Kosura Willis

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Kenya.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34541. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34541. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

Agricultural advisory services help farmers to access farming skills, technologies and agricultural markets. The services are offered by different actors, who all together form the pluralistic advisory service providers. In recent years, pluralistic advisory service providers have emerged in various developing countries including Tanzania. Pluralistic providers have different institutional arrangements and varying levels of effectiveness, which lead farmers to have diverse perceptions towards them. However, the perceptions of farmers on pluralistic advisory services have not been fully documented, making it difficult to gauge the level of acceptance of the diverse services offered. This paper employs principal component analysis (PCA) and Q-methodology to elicit farmers' perceptions on the pluralistic services using samples of 627 and 23 farmers, respectively. Results from both methods showed that pluralistic providers offered diverse services ranging from production to market information. Further, the two approaches provided concurring findings that advisory services offered did not meet farmers' advisory demands. Furthermore, each method served to fill the shortcomings of the other. Therefore, we recommend a complementary application of both approaches rather than treating them as mutually exclusive in the analysis of perceptions.

摘要

农业咨询服务帮助农民获得农业技能、技术和进入农产品市场。这些服务由不同行为主体提供,他们共同构成了多元化的咨询服务提供者。近年来,包括坦桑尼亚在内的各个发展中国家都出现了多元化的咨询服务提供者。多元化的提供者有不同的制度安排和不同程度的有效性,这导致农民对他们有不同的看法。然而,农民对多元化咨询服务的看法尚未得到充分记录,这使得难以衡量所提供的各种服务的接受程度。本文分别采用主成分分析(PCA)和Q方法,以627名和23名农民为样本,来了解农民对多元化服务的看法。两种方法的结果都表明,多元化的提供者提供了从生产到市场信息等各种各样的服务。此外,这两种方法得出了一致的结果,即所提供的咨询服务未能满足农民的咨询需求。而且,每种方法都弥补了对方的不足。因此,我们建议在对看法的分析中,将这两种方法互补应用,而不是将它们视为相互排斥的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/11304023/690fc516f620/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验