Department of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China.
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2387205. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2387205. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
To compare the impact of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) on outcomes in elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients.
A retrospective matched cohort study was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline conditions, and we compared all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), hospitalization, and infection rates between AVF and TCC patients ≥70 years old. Cox survival analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for death.
There were 2119 patients from our center in the Chinese National Renal Data System (CNRDS) between 1 January 2010 and 10 October 2023. Among these patients, 77 TCC patients were matched with 77 AVF patients. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the TCC and AVF groups (30.1/100 33.3/100 patient-years, = 0.124). Among the propensity score-matched cohorts, no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier curves were observed between the two groups (log-rank = 0.242). The TCC group had higher rates of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection than the AVF group (33.7/100 29.5/100 patient-years, 101.2/100 79.5/100 patient-years, and 30.1/100 14.1/100 patient-years, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was a risk factor for death.
There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between elderly HD patients receiving TCCs and AVFs. Compared with those with a TCC, elderly HD patients with an AVF have a lower risk of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection.
比较隧道式带袖套导管(TCC)和动静脉瘘(AVF)对老年血液透析(HD)患者结局的影响。
回顾性匹配队列研究。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡基线条件,比较年龄≥70 岁的 TCC 和 AVF 患者的全因死亡率、主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)、住院和感染率。采用 Cox 生存分析分析死亡的危险因素。
中国国家肾脏数据系统(CNRDS)中有 2119 名患者在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 10 日期间纳入研究。其中 77 例 TCC 患者与 77 例 AVF 患者匹配。TCC 组和 AVF 组的全因死亡率无显著差异(30.1/100 33.3/100 患者年,=0.124)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,两组的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线无显著差异(对数秩检验=0.242)。TCC 组的 MACCEs、住院和感染发生率均高于 AVF 组(33.7/100 29.5/100 患者年,101.2/100 79.5/100 患者年和 30.1/100 14.1/100 患者年)。多因素分析显示,高Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)评分是死亡的危险因素。
老年血液透析患者接受 TCC 和 AVF 治疗的全因死亡率无显著差异。与 TCC 相比,老年 HD 患者中 AVF 的 MACCEs、住院和感染风险较低。