Suppr超能文献

血管通路类型与老年血液透析患者预后的关系:倾向评分匹配研究。

Vascular access type and prognosis in elderly hemodialysis patients: a propensity-score-matched study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2387205. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2387205. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the impact of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) on outcomes in elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline conditions, and we compared all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), hospitalization, and infection rates between AVF and TCC patients ≥70 years old. Cox survival analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for death.

RESULTS

There were 2119 patients from our center in the Chinese National Renal Data System (CNRDS) between 1 January 2010 and 10 October 2023. Among these patients, 77 TCC patients were matched with 77 AVF patients. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the TCC and AVF groups (30.1/100 33.3/100 patient-years,  = 0.124). Among the propensity score-matched cohorts, no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier curves were observed between the two groups (log-rank  = 0.242). The TCC group had higher rates of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection than the AVF group (33.7/100 29.5/100 patient-years, 101.2/100 79.5/100 patient-years, and 30.1/100 14.1/100 patient-years, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was a risk factor for death.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between elderly HD patients receiving TCCs and AVFs. Compared with those with a TCC, elderly HD patients with an AVF have a lower risk of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection.

摘要

背景

比较隧道式带袖套导管(TCC)和动静脉瘘(AVF)对老年血液透析(HD)患者结局的影响。

方法

回顾性匹配队列研究。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡基线条件,比较年龄≥70 岁的 TCC 和 AVF 患者的全因死亡率、主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)、住院和感染率。采用 Cox 生存分析分析死亡的危险因素。

结果

中国国家肾脏数据系统(CNRDS)中有 2119 名患者在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 10 日期间纳入研究。其中 77 例 TCC 患者与 77 例 AVF 患者匹配。TCC 组和 AVF 组的全因死亡率无显著差异(30.1/100 33.3/100 患者年,=0.124)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,两组的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线无显著差异(对数秩检验=0.242)。TCC 组的 MACCEs、住院和感染发生率均高于 AVF 组(33.7/100 29.5/100 患者年,101.2/100 79.5/100 患者年和 30.1/100 14.1/100 患者年)。多因素分析显示,高Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)评分是死亡的危险因素。

结论

老年血液透析患者接受 TCC 和 AVF 治疗的全因死亡率无显著差异。与 TCC 相比,老年 HD 患者中 AVF 的 MACCEs、住院和感染风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e92/11318482/abc15e699f13/IRNF_A_2387205_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验