Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):e242446. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2446.
In Medicare Advantage (MA), step therapy for physician-administered drugs is an approach to lowering drug spending. The impact of step therapy in MA on prescribing behavior and the magnitude of any changes has not been analyzed.
To evaluate the impact of step therapy on macular degeneration drug prescribing patterns for 3 large MA insurers.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective encounter-based analysis using 20% nationally representative MA outpatient and carrier encounter records for 2017 to 2019. Participants were MA beneficiaries who were 65 years or older and had received a macular degeneration drug administration. Macular degeneration drug administrations for beneficiaries of MA Aetna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare (UHC) insurers were assessed. Humana implemented macular degeneration step therapy in 2019, setting bevacizumab as the plan-preferred drug, and aflibercept and ranibizumab as the plan-nonpreferred drugs. Aetna and UHC, which did not implement macular degeneration step therapy, served as the control group. Data analyses were performed from May 2024 to December 2024.
A macular degeneration drug administration subject to a step therapy policy.
A binary indicator of whether the drug administered was bevacizumab. Linear probability models and a difference-in-differences framework were used to quantify changes in prescribing patterns before and after the introduction of step therapy for MA insurers that did and did not implement step therapy. To empirically measure the impact of step therapy, the first administration of a treatment episode was assessed, followed by switching patterns.
A total of 18 331 MA beneficiaries, 21 683 treatment episodes, and 171 985 drug administrations were included across the control and treatment groups. The difference-in-differences regressions found a 7.8% (95% CI, 4.9%-10.7%; P < .001) greater probability of being prescribed bevacizumab for the first administration due to step therapy. The predicted probabilities of preferred-drug administration in the treatment group increased from 0.61 to 0.70 between the periods before and after step therapy implementation for the first administration. Step therapy was not significantly associated with an increased rate of medication switching (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06; P = .15).
The findings of this retrospective encounter-based analysis indicate that step therapy is associated with a greater probability of prescribing the plan-preferred drug for the first administration. The analysis failed to find a statistically significant greater rate of medication switching within a treatment episode. Step therapy changed macular degeneration prescribing patterns, but step therapy alone did not transition all administrations to the plan-preferred drug.
在医疗保险优势(MA)中,针对医生开具药物的分步治疗是降低药物支出的一种方法。但尚未分析 MA 中分步治疗对处方行为的影响及其变化的幅度。
评估分步治疗对 3 家大型 MA 保险公司治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性药物处方模式的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于 2017 年至 2019 年全国 20%的 MA 门诊和承运人就诊记录的基于回顾性的基于就诊的分析。参与者为年龄在 65 岁或以上且接受过年龄相关性黄斑变性药物治疗的 MA 受保人。评估了 MA 安泰、Humana 和 UnitedHealthcare(UHC)保险公司受益人的年龄相关性黄斑变性药物治疗。Humana 在 2019 年实施了年龄相关性黄斑变性分步治疗,将贝伐单抗设定为计划首选药物,将阿柏西普和雷珠单抗设定为计划非首选药物。安泰和 UHC 没有实施年龄相关性黄斑变性分步治疗,作为对照组。数据分析于 2024 年 5 月至 2024 年 12 月进行。
接受分步治疗政策的年龄相关性黄斑变性药物治疗。
用于治疗的药物是否为贝伐单抗的二进制指标。使用线性概率模型和差异中的差异框架来量化实施分步治疗的 MA 保险公司和未实施分步治疗的保险公司在治疗前和治疗后的处方模式变化。为了从经验上衡量分步治疗的影响,评估了治疗发作的第一次给药,然后评估了给药的转换模式。
在对照组和治疗组中,共有 18331 名 MA 受保人、21683 个治疗发作和 171985 次药物治疗。差异中的差异回归发现,由于分步治疗,第一次给药时,贝伐单抗的处方概率增加了 7.8%(95%CI,4.9%-10.7%;P<0.001)。在治疗组中,第一次给药后,首选药物治疗的预测概率从治疗前的 0.61 增加到 0.70。分步治疗与药物转换率的增加无显著相关性(风险比,0.86;95%CI,0.71-1.06;P=0.15)。
这项基于回顾性就诊的分析发现,分步治疗与第一次给药时首选药物处方的可能性增加有关。分析未发现治疗发作内药物转换的发生率有统计学意义上的显著增加。分步治疗改变了年龄相关性黄斑变性的处方模式,但分步治疗本身并不能将所有治疗都转为首选药物。