UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Aug 9;8(Suppl 4):e015097. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097.
Routine assessment of health facility capacity to provide abortion and post-abortion care can inform policy and programmes to expand access and improve quality. Since 2018, abortion and/or post-abortion care have been integrated into two WHO health facility assessment tools: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Harmonised Health Facility Assessment. We discuss lessons learnt through experiences integrating abortion into these standardised tools. Our experiences highlight the feasibility of including abortion in health facility assessments across a range of legal contexts. Factors facilitating the integration of abortion include cross-country collaboration and experience sharing, timely inputs into tool adaptations, clear leadership, close relationships among key stakeholders as in assessment coordination groups, use of locally appropriate terminology to refer to abortion and reference to national policies and guidelines. To facilitate high-quality data collection, we identify considerations around question sequencing in tool design, appropriate terminology and the need to balance the normalisation of abortion with adequate sensitisation and education of data collectors. To facilitate appropriate and consistent analysis, future work must ensure adequate disaggregation of recommended and non-recommended abortion methods, alignment with national guidelines and development of a standardised approach for measuring abortion service readiness. Measurement of abortion service availability and readiness should be a routine practice and a standardised component of health facility assessment tools. Evidence generated by health facility assessments that include abortion monitoring can guide efforts to expand access to timely and effective care and help normalise abortion as a core component of sexual and reproductive healthcare.
常规评估医疗机构提供堕胎和堕胎后护理的能力,可以为扩大服务提供途径和提高服务质量的政策和规划提供信息。自 2018 年以来,堕胎和/或堕胎后护理已被纳入世卫组织的两项卫生机构评估工具中:服务提供情况和准备情况评估以及协调的卫生机构评估。我们将讨论通过将堕胎纳入这些标准化工具中所获得的经验教训。我们的经验表明,在各种法律环境下,将堕胎纳入卫生机构评估是可行的。促进堕胎纳入的因素包括跨国合作和经验分享、及时为工具调整提供投入、明确的领导、评估协调小组等关键利益攸关方之间的密切关系、使用当地适当的术语来指代堕胎并参考国家政策和指南。为了促进高质量的数据收集,我们确定了在工具设计、适当术语和平衡堕胎正常化与数据收集员充分敏感化和教育之间需要考虑的问题序列。为了便于进行适当和一致的分析,未来的工作必须确保对推荐和非推荐堕胎方法进行充分分类,与国家准则保持一致,并制定衡量堕胎服务准备情况的标准化方法。堕胎服务提供情况和准备情况的衡量应成为常规做法,并成为卫生机构评估工具的标准组成部分。包括堕胎监测的卫生机构评估所产生的证据可以指导扩大及时和有效的护理服务的努力,并有助于将堕胎正常化,使其成为性健康和生殖健康护理的核心组成部分。