Hofbauer Lena M, Rodriguez Pd Francisca S
Research Group Psychosocial Epidemiology and Public Health, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany.
J Aging Health. 2024 Aug 13;37(9):8982643241273988. doi: 10.1177/08982643241273988.
We aimed to investigate the mediating role of lifestyle activities in the association between social deprivation and cognition. To investigate, we analysed data of 3867 respondents (Mean Age: 73.37, SD: 5.57) in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) using growth curve and path analysis, adjusted for demographic and health covariates. Being in the high (vs. moderate) Social Deprivation Index group was associated with lower cognition scores (β = -2.63, [95 % CI: -2.90, -2.36]). Conversely, higher (vs. lower) Lifestyle Index scores were associated with higher cognition scores (β = 1.17, [95 % CI: 0.72, 1.63]). In mediation analysis, the Lifestyle Index score explained 27 % of the association of So Dep Index group on cognition at the final follow-up. While lifestyle activities did mediate the association between social deprivation and cognition, factors not investigated accounted for the majority of the variation. These may include systemic disadvantages.
我们旨在研究生活方式活动在社会剥夺与认知之间的关联中所起的中介作用。为了进行研究,我们使用生长曲线和路径分析,对美国健康与退休研究(HRS)中3867名受访者(平均年龄:73.37,标准差:5.57)的数据进行了分析,并对人口统计学和健康协变量进行了调整。处于高(相对于中等)社会剥夺指数组与较低的认知得分相关(β = -2.63,[95%置信区间:-2.90,-2.36])。相反,较高(相对于较低)的生活方式指数得分与较高的认知得分相关(β = 1.17,[95%置信区间:0.72,1.63])。在中介分析中,生活方式指数得分在最终随访时解释了社会剥夺指数组与认知之间关联的27%。虽然生活方式活动确实介导了社会剥夺与认知之间的关联,但未调查的因素占变异的大部分。这些因素可能包括系统性劣势。