Suppr超能文献

运用名义群体技术,让在加拿大联邦监狱服刑的人找出改善监狱内针具交换项目参与度的障碍和解决方案。

Using nominal group technique with people who are incarcerated in Canadian federal prisons to identify barriers and solutions to improving Prison Needle Exchange Program uptake.

机构信息

Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Goodsell Building, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia; The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Level 6, Wallace Wurth, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College St., Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA; Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Sep;131:104549. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104549. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prison needle exchange programs (PNEPs) are a critical component for harm reduction in prisons. Little is known about the PNEP access barriers for people who are incarcerated, but the low uptake in the Canadian program highlights these constraints. We aimed to identify the barriers and potential solutions for increasing PNEP coverage in the nine Canadian federal prisons where they operate.

METHODS

Eighteen focus groups were conducted in nine prisons using nominal group technique (NGT) with two stakeholders: peer advocates and people who use or identified as potential users of the PNEP. NGT uses a round-robin technique followed by generating a list of barriers to PNEP enrolment within their prison. Participants then allocated votes to rank the highest priority barriers, followed by an identical process to generate solutions to address the top three barriers. Interview transcripts describing participant narratives during this process were de-identified and coded to generated themes. Barriers and solutions receiving >10 % of votes within respective participant groups, alongside associated narratives, are discussed more fully.

RESULTS

Fear of repercussions due to drug use, lack of confidentiality, and fear of being targeted and sanctioned by correctional authorities were perceived by both stakeholder groups as the top barriers inhibiting PNEP enrolment. Stigma (peer advocates) and the application process for the program (PNEP users) were also ranked as a priority. Proposed solutions included education and external oversight of PNEP (i.e., not via correctional officers) by both groups. Peer advocates regarded improving participant confidentiality and a supervised/safe injection site as potential enablers for program participation, while PNEP users identified wrap-around services as likely to improve access.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to increasing PNEP coverage in Canadian federal prisons proposed by participants highlight the importance of trust and perceived repercussions surrounding program participation. These barriers and proposed solutions highlight a need for changes in implementation to PNEP delivery if the potential health benefits of PNEPs are to be realised.

摘要

背景

监狱内的针具交换计划(PNEP)是减少伤害的重要组成部分。人们对监禁者获得 PNEP 的障碍知之甚少,但加拿大计划的低参与率突出了这些限制。我们旨在确定在加拿大九个运营 PNEP 的联邦监狱中增加 PNEP 覆盖率的障碍和潜在解决方案。

方法

使用名义群体技术(NGT)在九个监狱中进行了 18 个焦点小组,参与者为同伴倡导者和使用或认为可能使用 PNEP 的人。NGT 使用轮询技术,然后在监狱内列出 PNEP 登记的障碍清单。参与者随后投票对最高优先级的障碍进行排名,然后采用相同的流程生成解决前三个障碍的方案。描述参与者在该过程中的叙述的访谈记录被去识别和编码,以生成主题。在各自的参与者群体中获得超过 10%选票的障碍和解决方案,以及相关的叙述,将进行更全面的讨论。

结果

两组参与者都认为,由于吸毒而受到惩罚、缺乏保密性、担心被惩教当局针对和制裁,是阻碍 PNEP 登记的首要障碍。同伴倡导者还认为耻辱感(同伴倡导者)和该计划的申请流程(PNEP 用户)也是一个优先事项。两组参与者都提出了包括 PNEP 教育和外部监督(即不由惩教官员监督)的解决方案。同伴倡导者认为,提高参与者的保密性和监督/安全注射场所是参与该计划的潜在手段,而 PNEP 用户则认为扩大服务范围可能会提高准入率。

结论

参与者提出的增加加拿大联邦监狱 PNEP 覆盖率的障碍强调了围绕计划参与的信任和可感知的后果的重要性。这些障碍和提出的解决方案突显了,如果要实现 PNEP 的潜在健康效益,需要对 PNEP 实施进行改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验