Kanbar Karim, El Darzi Roy, Jaalouk Diana E
Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Front Genet. 2024 Jul 31;15:1434002. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1434002. eCollection 2024.
Cancer continues to present a substantial global health challenge, with its incidence and mortality rates persistently reflecting its significant impact. The emergence of precision oncology has provided a breakthrough in targeting oncogenic drivers previously deemed "undruggable" by conventional therapeutics and by limiting off-target cytotoxicity. Two groundbreaking technologies that have revolutionized the field of precision oncology are primarily CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and more recently PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras) targeted protein degradation technology. CRISPR-Cas9, in particular, has gained widespread recognition and acclaim due to its remarkable ability to modify DNA sequences precisely. Rather than editing the genetic code, PROTACs harness the ubiquitin proteasome degradation machinery to degrade proteins of interest selectively. Even though CRISPR-Cas9 and PROTAC technologies operate on different principles, they share a common goal of advancing precision oncology whereby both approaches have demonstrated remarkable potential in preclinical and promising data in clinical trials. CRISPR-Cas9 has demonstrated its clinical potential in this field due to its ability to modify genes directly and indirectly in a precise, efficient, reversible, adaptable, and tissue-specific manner, and its potential as a diagnostic tool. On the other hand, the ability to administer in low doses orally, broad targeting, tissue specificity, and controllability have reinforced the clinical potential of PROTAC. Thus, in the field of precision oncology, gene editing using CRISPR technology has revolutionized targeted interventions, while the emergence of PROTACs has further expanded the therapeutic landscape by enabling selective protein degradation. Rather than viewing them as mutually exclusive or competing methods in the field of precision oncology, their use is context-dependent (i.e., based on the molecular mechanisms of the disease) and they potentially could be used synergistically complementing the strengths of CRISPR and . Herein, we review the current status of CRISPR and PROTAC designs and their implications in the field of precision oncology in terms of clinical potential, clinical trial data, limitations, and compare their implications in precision clinical oncology.
癌症仍然是一项重大的全球健康挑战,其发病率和死亡率持续反映出它的重大影响。精准肿瘤学的出现带来了突破,它能够靶向传统疗法以前认为“不可成药”的致癌驱动因素,并限制脱靶细胞毒性。两项彻底改变精准肿瘤学领域的开创性技术主要是CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑技术,以及最近的PROTAC(蛋白酶靶向嵌合体)靶向蛋白质降解技术。特别是CRISPR-Cas9,因其精确修饰DNA序列的卓越能力而获得了广泛认可和赞誉。PROTAC不是编辑遗传密码,而是利用泛素蛋白酶体降解机制选择性地降解感兴趣的蛋白质。尽管CRISPR-Cas9和PROTAC技术的运作原理不同,但它们有着推进精准肿瘤学的共同目标,两种方法在临床前均已展现出显著潜力,在临床试验中也有前景良好的数据。CRISPR-Cas9已在该领域展现出临床潜力,因为它能够以精确、高效、可逆、可适应和组织特异性的方式直接和间接修饰基因,并且具有作为诊断工具的潜力。另一方面,低剂量口服给药的能力、广泛的靶向性、组织特异性和可控性增强了PROTAC的临床潜力。因此,在精准肿瘤学领域,使用CRISPR技术进行基因编辑彻底改变了靶向干预,而PROTAC的出现通过实现选择性蛋白质降解进一步扩展了治疗前景。在精准肿瘤学领域,不应将它们视为相互排斥或竞争的方法,它们的使用取决于具体情况(即基于疾病的分子机制),并且它们有可能协同使用,互补CRISPR和……的优势。在此,我们综述CRISPR和PROTAC设计的现状,以及它们在精准肿瘤学领域在临床潜力、临床试验数据、局限性方面的意义,并比较它们在精准临床肿瘤学中的意义。