Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Aug;34(8):e14713. doi: 10.1111/sms.14713.
Evidence has demonstrated that athletes exhibit superior cognitive performance associated with executive control. In the oculomotor system, this function has been examined using the interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade task (IPAST), wherein participants, prior to target appearance, are instructed to either automatically look at the peripheral target (pro-saccade) or suppress the automatic response and voluntarily look in the opposite direction (anti-saccade). While the IPAST has provided much insight into sensorimotor and inhibitory processing, it has yet to be performed in athletes. Moreover, limited research has examined saccade metrics in athletes. Here, we examined saccade latency and movement kinematics in the IPAST among athletes (N = 40) and nonathletes (NON) (N = 40). Higher direction error rates were obtained in the anti-saccade compared to the pro-saccade condition, with no differences between athletes and NON noted. Significantly faster saccade latencies were observed in athletes compared to NON in both conditions, in addition to faster pro-saccades compared to anti-saccades. Furthermore, athletes showed significantly higher frequencies and faster latencies of express saccades compared to NON in correct pro-saccades. Additionally, athletes exhibited significantly faster latencies of express saccades compared to NON in erroneous anti-saccades. Differences in saccade metrics between athletes and NON were not seen. Overall, these findings demonstrate that athletes display altered saccade performance likely associated with sensorimotor and preparatory processing, highlighting the potential of using IPAST to objectively investigate sensorimotor and cognitive functions in athletes.
证据表明,运动员表现出与执行控制相关的卓越认知表现。在眼球运动系统中,这项功能已通过交错前向扫视和反向扫视任务(IPAST)进行了研究,在目标出现之前,参与者被指示要么自动看向周边目标(前向扫视),要么抑制自动反应并自愿看向相反方向(反向扫视)。虽然 IPAST 为感觉运动和抑制加工提供了很多深入了解,但它尚未在运动员中进行。此外,对运动员的扫视指标的研究有限。在这里,我们在运动员(N=40)和非运动员(NON)(N=40)中检查了 IPAST 中的扫视潜伏期和运动运动学。与前向扫视相比,反向扫视的方向错误率更高,运动员和 NON 之间没有差异。与 NON 相比,在两种情况下,运动员的扫视潜伏期都明显更快,此外,前向扫视比反向扫视更快。此外,与 NON 相比,在正确的前向扫视中,运动员的快速扫视出现的频率和潜伏期都明显更高。此外,与 NON 相比,在错误的反向扫视中,运动员的快速扫视潜伏期明显更快。运动员和 NON 之间的扫视指标没有差异。总体而言,这些发现表明运动员表现出改变的扫视表现,可能与感觉运动和预备加工有关,突出了使用 IPAST 客观研究运动员感觉运动和认知功能的潜力。