Tomatis L
Princess Takamatsu Symp. 1985;16:325-35.
Several dietary exposures may increase the risk of cancer, while others may have a protective effect. The degrees of evidence for a casual relationship between these exposures and human cancer vary considerably, as do their suitability for prevention. Investigations on the mechanisms by which food components contribute to either increase or decrease cancer risks therefore deserve priority, as their results would allow a quantitative evaluation of risks and of their preventability. Dietary factors are likely to contribute directly or indirectly to the induction of cancer in a variety of organs--namely, oesophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, liver, breast and endometrium, as well as the oral cavity and larynx. In addition, certain dietary factors may contribute to the prevention of cancer at other sites, as, for instance, the lung and prostate. Dietary interventions may therefore have a very considerable impact on prevention. This is certainly not the least reason for the attraction that intervention studies exert on scientists. Attractive as they may be, however, they should not encourage short-cuts, in the belief that understanding of the means for the prevention of cancer might be easier than understanding of the mechanisms of its induction. This very timely symposium has exposed the controversies that still exist about certain basic assumptions on the role of dietary factors in human cancer, and has underlined the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
一些饮食因素可能会增加患癌风险,而其他一些因素则可能具有保护作用。这些因素与人类癌症之间因果关系的证据程度差异很大,其预防的适用性也是如此。因此,对食物成分增加或降低癌症风险的机制进行研究应优先进行,因为其结果将有助于对风险及其可预防性进行定量评估。饮食因素可能直接或间接导致多种器官发生癌症,即食管、胃、结肠和直肠、肝脏、乳腺和子宫内膜,以及口腔和喉部。此外,某些饮食因素可能有助于预防其他部位的癌症,例如肺癌和前列腺癌。因此,饮食干预可能对癌症预防产生非常重大的影响。这当然是干预研究吸引科学家的一个重要原因。然而,尽管干预研究可能很有吸引力,但不应鼓励走捷径,认为了解癌症预防方法可能比了解癌症诱发机制更容易。这次非常及时的研讨会揭示了关于饮食因素在人类癌症中的作用的某些基本假设仍然存在的争议,并强调了采用多学科方法理解潜在机制的重要性。