Domanski Nicole, Leung Carmen
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia.
Innov Pharm. 2024 May 31;15(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v15i2.6147. eCollection 2024.
Documentation of clinical encounters continues to be a challenge to implement in practice and there is a lack of literature on documentation best practices in pharmacy. In order to inform documentation practices at an academic pharmacy clinic, a quality assurance (QA) initiative was implemented at the UBC Pharmacists Clinic (the Clinic). The goal of this QA initiative was to determine what facilitators and barriers to documentation existed for Clinic pharmacists and improve the efficiency of consultation note writing. Phase 1 conducted an online survey to assess each pharmacist's documentation practice at baseline. Phase 2 implemented new interventions that could advance these skills. There were five main interventions introduced: 1) revised consultation note templates, 2) a documentation "checklist", 3) a documentation "decision tree", 4) a clinical documentation guide and 5) a documentation peer-feedback workshop. During Phase 3, pharmacists re-answered the same survey questions 10 months later. This allowed for a direct comparison of documentation practices and skills before and after the interventions. After the interventions, pharmacists reduced the time to complete their notes by nearly 14 min. The revised note structure resulted in an increased uptake of template use from 37% to 100%. Furthermore, prior to the interventions, the majority of pharmacists ranked writing consultation notes as the most burdensome aspect of their daily workflow. Afterwards, the perceived level of burden reduced significantly. These findings can be used to inform how students are taught documentation and improve the quality of documentation by pharmacists in team-based or primary care settings.
在实际操作中,临床诊疗记录的撰写仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,而且关于药学领域记录最佳实践的文献也很匮乏。为了指导学术性药学诊所的记录工作,英属哥伦比亚大学药剂师诊所(以下简称“诊所”)实施了一项质量保证(QA)计划。该QA计划的目标是确定诊所药剂师在记录方面存在哪些促进因素和障碍,并提高会诊记录撰写的效率。第一阶段进行了一项在线调查,以评估每位药剂师在基线时的记录实践。第二阶段实施了可以提升这些技能的新干预措施。共引入了五项主要干预措施:1)修订会诊记录模板;2)一份记录“清单”;3)一份记录“决策树”;4)一份临床记录指南;5)一次记录同行反馈研讨会。在第三阶段,药剂师在10个月后重新回答了相同的调查问题。这使得可以直接比较干预前后的记录实践和技能。干预措施实施后,药剂师完成记录的时间减少了近14分钟。修订后的记录结构使模板的使用率从37%提高到了100%。此外,在干预措施实施之前,大多数药剂师将撰写会诊记录列为日常工作流程中最繁重的部分。之后,他们感受到的负担程度显著降低。这些研究结果可用于指导学生如何学习记录,并提高团队医疗或初级保健环境中药剂师的记录质量。