Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Oct 15;39(9):1000-1005. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae073.
Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for health and health systems interventions and programs is vital to improve health, health systems, and gender equality outcomes. It can be used to identify and address gender disparities in program participation, outcomes and benefits, as well as ensure that programs are designed and implemented in a way that is inclusive and accessible for all. While gender-responsive M&E is most effective when interventions and programs intentionally integrate a gender lens, it is relevant for all health systems programs and interventions. Within the literature, gender-responsive M&E is defined in different and diverse ways, making it difficult to operationalize. This is compounded by the complexity and multi-faceted nature of gender. Within this methodological musing, we present our evolving approach to gender-responsive M&E which we are operationalizing within the Monitoring for Gender and Equity project. We define gender-responsive M&E as intentionally integrating the needs, rights, preferences of, and power relations among, women and girls, men and boys, and gender minority individuals, as well as across social, political, economic, and health systems in M&E processes. This is done through the integration of different types of gender data and indicators, including: sex- or gender-specific, sex- or gender-disaggregated, sex- or gender-specific/disaggregated which incorporate needs, rights and preferences, and gender power relations and systems indicators. Examples of each of these are included within the paper. Active approaches can also enhance the gender-responsiveness of any M&E activities, including incorporating an intersectional lens and tailoring the types of data and indicators included and processes used to the specific context. Incorporating gender into the programmatic cycle, including M&E, can lead to more fit-for-purpose, effective and equitable programs and interventions. The framework presented in this paper provides an outline of how to do this, enabling the uptake of gender-responsive M&E.
性别平等监测和评价(M&E)对于卫生和卫生系统干预措施和项目至关重要,可改善健康、卫生系统和性别平等成果。它可以用于确定和解决方案参与、结果和收益方面的性别差距,并确保方案的设计和实施对所有人具有包容性和可及性。虽然干预措施和方案有目的地纳入性别视角时,性别平等监测和评价最有效,但它也与所有卫生系统方案和干预措施相关。在文献中,性别平等监测和评价有不同的定义和多样化的表述,这使得其难以付诸实践。此外,性别问题的复杂性和多面性也使得情况更加复杂。在本方法思考中,我们提出了我们在监测性别与公平项目中正在实施的不断发展的性别平等监测和评价方法。我们将性别平等监测和评价定义为有目的地将妇女和女孩、男子和男孩以及性别少数群体个人的需求、权利、偏好和权力关系,以及社会、政治、经济和卫生系统纳入监测和评价过程。这是通过整合不同类型的性别数据和指标来实现的,包括:性别特定、性别分类、性别特定/分类,这些指标纳入了需求、权利和偏好以及性别权力关系和系统指标。本文包括了每一种指标的示例。积极的方法也可以增强任何监测和评价活动的性别敏感性,包括纳入交叉视角和根据具体情况定制所包含的数据和指标类型以及使用的过程。将性别纳入方案周期,包括监测和评价,可以使方案和干预措施更适合、更有效和更公平。本文提出的框架提供了如何实现这一目标的概述,使性别平等监测和评价得到采纳。