Stefana Alberto, Fusar-Poli Paolo, Vieta Eduard, Youngstrom Eric A
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1367516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367516. eCollection 2024.
In this study, we examined how four components of the therapeutic relationship-working alliance, real relationship, and positive and negative affective reactions of the patient toward their therapist-relate to each other and to the psychotherapy session outcome, from the patient's point of view. Our simple comprised 700 adult patients in individual psychotherapy who were recruited and participated online. They underwent a baseline evaluation of their most recent therapy session, which encompassed a series of validated self-report measures focused on specific elements of the therapeutic relationship. The results revealed that, from the patient's perspective, working alliance, real relationship, and positive affective reactions toward the therapist were positively correlated with session outcome, while negative affective reactions were negatively correlated. All components predicted session outcome when simultaneously included in a regression model. Collectively, these four components accounted for 30% of the variance in session outcome. Factor analysis revealed four distinct factors, underlying perceptions of the therapeutic relationship. Notably, the bond dimension of the alliance was sufficiently different from the task and goal dimensions, warranting consideration as a distinct construct. These findings, although cross-sectional, lay the groundwork for a more nuanced investigation of multiple dimensions of the therapeutic relationship.
在本研究中,我们从患者的角度考察了治疗关系的四个组成部分——工作同盟、真实关系以及患者对治疗师的正负性情感反应——彼此之间的关联以及与心理治疗疗程结果的关联。我们的样本包括700名接受个体心理治疗的成年患者,他们通过网络招募并参与研究。他们对自己最近一次治疗疗程进行了基线评估,其中包括一系列针对治疗关系特定要素的经过验证的自我报告测量。结果显示,从患者的角度来看,工作同盟、真实关系以及对治疗师的正性情感反应与疗程结果呈正相关,而负性情感反应则呈负相关。当所有组成部分同时纳入回归模型时,均能预测疗程结果。总体而言,这四个组成部分解释了疗程结果中30%的方差。因子分析揭示了治疗关系背后的四个不同因子。值得注意的是,同盟的纽带维度与任务和目标维度有足够差异,值得作为一个独特的结构来考虑。这些发现虽然是横断面研究,但为更细致地探究治疗关系的多个维度奠定了基础。