Rova Konstantina, Joffily Lucia, Carvalho Lara, Cortese Elvira, Koohi Nehzat, Kaski Diego
Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
ENT Department, General Hospital George Papanikolaou, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1426081. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1426081. eCollection 2024.
Vestibular Migraine (VM) is a prevalent vestibular disorder, affecting up to 2.7% of the general population. Despite the establishment of diagnostic criteria by the Bárány Society and its inclusion in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, the clinical diagnosis of VM remains challenging due to its complex pathophysiology and symptom overlap with other dizziness disorders. Motion sickness is a core feature of migraine and can be interrogated through simple questionnaires.
This study aims to identify to what extent motion sensitivity can predict VM compared to other causes of dizziness.
We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 113 patients from the vestibular neurology clinics at University College London Hospitals. Participants were categorized into VM, Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD), combined VM and PPPD, and 'other' dizziness etiologies. Data on motion sickness history and dizziness during car travel were collected through structured interviews and analyzed using logistic regression to assess the predictive value of these symptoms for VM.
A substantial portion of patients with VM (91.2%) reported nausea or dizziness when reading as a passenger, a symptom significantly more prevalent than in those with PPPD or other dizziness diagnoses. Logistic regression indicated that VM patients are significantly more likely to experience these symptoms compared to non-VM patients, with an odds ratio suggesting a strong predictive value for this symptom in diagnosing VM.
The findings highlight increased motion sensitivity while reading in a moving vehicle as a promising diagnostic tool for VM, offering a practical aid in clinical settings to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders.
前庭性偏头痛(VM)是一种常见的前庭疾病,影响着高达2.7%的普通人群。尽管巴兰尼协会制定了诊断标准且其被纳入《国际头痛疾病分类》,但由于其复杂的病理生理学以及与其他头晕疾病的症状重叠,VM的临床诊断仍然具有挑战性。晕动病是偏头痛的一个核心特征,可通过简单问卷进行询问。
本研究旨在确定与其他头晕原因相比,运动敏感性在多大程度上可预测VM。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了来自伦敦大学学院医院前庭神经科诊所的113名患者。参与者被分为VM组、持续性姿势性知觉性头晕(PPPD)组、VM与PPPD合并组以及“其他”头晕病因组。通过结构化访谈收集晕动病史和乘车时头晕的数据,并使用逻辑回归分析来评估这些症状对VM的预测价值。
很大一部分VM患者(91.2%)报告在乘车时阅读会出现恶心或头晕,这一症状在PPPD患者或其他头晕诊断患者中明显更为普遍。逻辑回归表明,与非VM患者相比,VM患者更有可能出现这些症状,优势比表明该症状在诊断VM方面具有很强的预测价值。
研究结果突出了在行驶车辆中阅读时运动敏感性增加作为VM一种有前景的诊断工具,为临床环境中区分VM与其他前庭疾病提供了一种实用帮助。