Othus Megan, Baccon Domitilla, Ali Naveed, Rodríguez-Arbolí Eduardo, Orvain Corentin, Milano Filippo, Sandmaier Brenda M, Davis Chris, Basom Ryan S, Walter Roland B
Public Health Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Translational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Dec;59(12):1667-1675. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02407-y. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
Outcomes of adults with AML after allografting vary widely. While numerous covariates have been associated with relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and/or shorter survival, the impact of incomplete blood count recovery before transplantation has remained unclear. To address this uncertainty, we examined all adults with AML or MDS/AML who received an allograft in first or second remission between 2006 and 2023 at a single institution. Of 1264 patients, 891 (70%) met criteria for CR, whereas 291 (23%), 24 (2%), and 58 (5%) were classified as CRh, CRi, and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), respectively. CR, CRh, CRi, and MLFS patients differed significantly regarding demographics, disease biology, pre-transplant measurable residual disease, and types of transplants. After multivariable adjustment, outcomes for CRh and CRi patients were not significantly different from each other or from those of CR patients. In contrast, outcomes of MLFS patients were substantially worse than those of CR and CRh patients, with significantly higher risk of NRM and relapse, and significantly shorter relapse-free and overall survival. Similar results were obtained in several distinct subsets. Together, our analysis provides empiric evidence for the importance of distinguishing MLFS from CR and CRh patients for optimized risk assessment and, possibly, individualized treatment decision making.
异基因移植后成人急性髓系白血病(AML)的预后差异很大。虽然许多协变量与复发、非复发死亡率(NRM)和/或较短生存期相关,但移植前全血细胞计数恢复不完全的影响仍不明确。为了解决这一不确定性,我们研究了2006年至2023年期间在单一机构首次或第二次缓解期接受异基因移植的所有AML或骨髓增生异常综合征/AML(MDS/AML)成人患者。在1264例患者中,891例(70%)符合完全缓解(CR)标准,而291例(23%)、24例(2%)和58例(5%)分别被分类为部分缓解(CRh)、未完全缓解(CRi)和形态学无白血病状态(MLFS)。CR、CRh、CRi和MLFS患者在人口统计学、疾病生物学、移植前可测量的残留疾病和移植类型方面存在显著差异。经过多变量调整后,CRh和CRi患者的预后彼此之间以及与CR患者的预后没有显著差异。相比之下,MLFS患者的预后明显比CR和CRh患者差,NRM和复发风险显著更高,无复发生存期和总生存期显著更短。在几个不同的亚组中也获得了类似的结果。总之,我们的分析为区分MLFS与CR和CRh患者对于优化风险评估以及可能的个体化治疗决策的重要性提供了实证依据。