Li Jiarui, Xiao Chunfeng, Li Tao, Duan Yanping, Jiang Yinan, Shi Lili, Hong Xia, Geng Wenqi, Hu Jiaojiao, Wang Yufei, Dai Bindong, Cao Jinya, Wei Jing
Department of Psychological Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
4+4 Medical Doctor Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 22;15:1447405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1447405. eCollection 2024.
Understanding treatment expectations of patients and their clinicians is of great importance in improving personalized medical services and enhancing patient safety systems.
To investigate treatment expectations of patients and their clinicians and compare differences between both, by using a pair of validated structured assessment tools covering three key aspects/dimensions of clinical interests.
This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China. The study enrolled patients aged 16 years and older receiving inpatient care and their clinicians. Patient recruitment was conducted from March 2023 to November 2023.
In addition to demographic and clinical characteristics, this study employed two validated structured assessment tools to evaluate treatment expectations among patients and their clinicians: the Hospitalized Patients' Expectations for Treatment Scale-Patient version (HOPE-P) and its counterpart, the Hospitalized Patients' Expectations for Treatment Scale-Clinician version (HOPE-C).
A total of 233 patients (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [15.1] years; 108 [46.4%] female) along with their clinicians, who numbered 75 in total were enrolled in this study. The distribution of total scores for HOPE-P and HOPE-C displayed similar patterns, with most scores concentrated in the higher range (above 50% of the full score). The mean HOPE-P total score was higher than that of HOPE-C (mean [SD] score, 38.78 [4.86] vs 37.49 [4.32]; = 3.12, = 0.002). In Dimension 2, the HOPE-P score was higher than HOPE-C (23.67 [3.20] vs 21.72 [3.03]; = 6.98, < 0.001). However, in Dimensions 1 and 3, HOPE-P scored lower than HOPE-C (13.37 [2.44] vs 13.84 [1.73]; = -2.384, < 0.018; 1.74 [1.14] vs 1.94 [1.00]; = -2.00, = 0.047). Certain demographic and clinical characteristics led to variations in patients' treatment expectations, including marital status, monthly family income, and smoking history.
This cross-sectional study revealed significant differences between patients' and doctors' treatment expectations. Notably, it highlighted the need for clinicians to focus on rationalizing patients' expectations concerning treatment outcomes.
ChiCTR2300075262.
了解患者及其临床医生的治疗期望对于改善个性化医疗服务和加强患者安全系统至关重要。
通过使用一对经过验证的结构化评估工具,涵盖临床关注的三个关键方面/维度,调查患者及其临床医生的治疗期望,并比较两者之间的差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这项单中心横断面研究在中国北京协和医院进行。该研究纳入了年龄在16岁及以上接受住院治疗的患者及其临床医生。患者招募于2023年3月至2023年11月进行。
除了人口统计学和临床特征外,本研究采用了两种经过验证的结构化评估工具来评估患者及其临床医生的治疗期望:住院患者治疗期望量表-患者版(HOPE-P)及其对应版本,住院患者治疗期望量表-临床医生版(HOPE-C)。
本研究共纳入了233名患者(平均[标准差]年龄,52.3[15.1]岁;108名[46.4%]女性)及其临床医生,临床医生共有75名。HOPE-P和HOPE-C的总分分布呈现相似模式,大多数分数集中在较高范围(高于满分的50%)。HOPE-P的平均总分高于HOPE-C(平均[标准差]分数,38.78[4.86]对37.49[4.32];t=3.12,P=0.002)。在维度2中,HOPE-P得分高于HOPE-C(23.67[3.20]对21.72[3.03];t=6.98,P<0.001)。然而,在维度1和3中,HOPE-P得分低于HOPE-C(13.37[2.44]对13.84[1.73];t=-2.384,P<0.018;1.74[1.14]对1.94[1.00];t=-2.00,P=0.047)。某些人口统计学和临床特征导致患者治疗期望的差异,包括婚姻状况、家庭月收入和吸烟史。
这项横断面研究揭示了患者和医生治疗期望之间的显著差异。值得注意的是,它强调了临床医生需要关注使患者对治疗结果的期望合理化。
中国临床试验注册标识符:ChiCTR2300075262。