Suppr超能文献

在以西班牙裔为主的社区加强结直肠癌筛查:一日与三日粪便检测试剂盒的有效性

Enhancing CRC Screening in a Predominantly Hispanic Community: Effectiveness of 1-Day vs. 3-Day Stool-Based Testing Kits.

作者信息

Wing Jonathan D, Matharasi Pracheta, Dwivedi Alok, Molokwu Jennifer

机构信息

Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.

Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2025 Feb;50(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01394-x. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among U.S. Hispanics, with screening proven to decrease both incidence and mortality. Despite rising CRC screening rates in the U.S., Hispanic participation remains disproportionately low. Stool-based tests, particularly popular for reaching underserved populations, may enhance screening adherence. This study evaluates the performance of a 1-day versus a 3-day stool-based testing kit in improving screening completion rates and reducing the need for reminder calls in a Hispanic community along the U.S.-Mexico border. In our quasi-experimental observational study, participants aged 45-75 years who were uninsured or underinsured and overdue for CRC screening were recruited. They received colorectal cancer education and no-cost stool-based screening facilitated by promotoras. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 1-day or 3-day Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit. The promotoras swapped FIT kit distribution roles midway through the study period to mitigate performance bias. Our analysis covered 6,660 FITs-3,067 using the 3-day kit and 3,593 with the 1-day kit. Results indicated a higher return rate for the 1-day FIT kit (61.3% vs. 58.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.22, p < 0.001), fewer reminders needed (69.7% vs. 78.1%, aOR = 0.65, p < 0.001), and lower abnormal FIT results (5.3% vs. 8.1%, aOR = 0.61, p < 0.001). Conclusively, the 1-day FIT kit required fewer reminders and significantly improved return rates, suggesting it may be a more effective option for increasing CRC screening completion among hard-to-reach Hispanic populations.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)是美国西班牙裔人群中癌症相关死亡的主要原因,筛查已被证明可降低发病率和死亡率。尽管美国的CRC筛查率在上升,但西班牙裔人群的参与率仍然低得不成比例。基于粪便的检测,尤其在服务不足人群中很受欢迎,可能会提高筛查的依从性。本研究评估了一种1天期与3天期基于粪便的检测试剂盒在提高美国与墨西哥边境西班牙裔社区筛查完成率和减少提醒电话需求方面的性能。在我们的准实验性观察研究中,招募了年龄在45 - 75岁、未参保或参保不足且CRC筛查逾期的参与者。他们接受了结直肠癌教育,并在社区健康工作者的协助下进行免费的基于粪便的筛查。参与者被随机分配接受1天期或3天期粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)试剂盒。在研究期间中途,社区健康工作者交换了FIT试剂盒分发角色,以减轻性能偏差。我们的分析涵盖了6660次FIT检测——使用3天期试剂盒的有3067次,使用1天期试剂盒的有3593次。结果表明,1天期FIT试剂盒的回收率更高(61.3%对58.7%,调整优势比[aOR]=1.22,p<0.001),所需提醒更少(69.7%对78.1%,aOR=0.65,p<0.001),FIT异常结果更低(5.3%对8.1%,aOR=0.61,p<0.001)。总之,1天期FIT试剂盒所需提醒更少,显著提高了回收率,表明它可能是提高难以触及的西班牙裔人群CRC筛查完成率的更有效选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验