Kivelä Liia M M, Fried Eiko I, van der Does Willem, Antypa Niki
Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Treatment and Expertise Center (LUBEC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9;54(12):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S003329172400151X.
Suicidal ideation arises from a complex interplay of multiple interacting risk factors over time. Recently, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has increased our understanding of factors associated with real-time suicidal ideation, as well as those predicting ideation at the level of hours and days. Here we used statistical network methods to investigate which cognitive-affective risk and protective factors are associated with the temporal dynamics of suicidal ideation.
The SAFE study is a longitudinal cohort study of 82 participants with current suicidal ideation who completed 4×/day EMA over 21 days. We modeled contemporaneous () and temporal ( 1) associations of three suicidal ideation components (passive ideation, active ideation, and acquired capability) and their predictors (positive and negative affect, anxiety, hopelessness, loneliness, burdensomeness, and optimism) using multilevel vector auto-regression models.
Contemporaneously, passive suicidal ideation was positively associated with sadness, hopelessness, loneliness, and burdensomeness, and negatively with happiness, calmness, and optimism; active suicidal ideation was positively associated with passive suicidal ideation, sadness, and shame; and acquired capability only with passive and active suicidal ideation. Acquired capability and hopelessness positively predicted passive ideation at 1, which in turn predicted active ideation; acquired capability was positively predicted at 1 by shame, and negatively by burdensomeness.
Our findings show that systematic real-time associations exist between suicidal ideation and its predictors, and that different factors may uniquely influence distinct components of ideation. These factors may represent important targets for safety planning and risk detection.
自杀意念源于多种相互作用的风险因素随时间的复杂相互作用。最近,生态瞬时评估(EMA)增进了我们对与实时自杀意念相关因素的理解,以及对在数小时和数天层面预测自杀意念的因素的理解。在此,我们使用统计网络方法来研究哪些认知情感风险和保护因素与自杀意念的时间动态相关。
SAFE研究是一项对82名当前有自杀意念的参与者进行的纵向队列研究,这些参与者在21天内每天完成4次EMA。我们使用多级向量自回归模型对三种自杀意念成分(被动意念、主动意念和获得能力)及其预测因素(积极和消极情绪、焦虑、绝望、孤独、负担感和乐观)的同期()和时间(1)关联进行建模。
同期,被动自杀意念与悲伤、绝望、孤独和负担感呈正相关,与幸福、平静和乐观呈负相关;主动自杀意念与被动自杀意念、悲伤和羞耻呈正相关;而获得能力仅与被动和主动自杀意念相关。获得能力和绝望在1时正向预测被动意念,被动意念进而预测主动意念;获得能力在1时被羞耻正向预测,被负担感负向预测。
我们的研究结果表明,自杀意念与其预测因素之间存在系统的实时关联,且不同因素可能独特地影响意念的不同成分。这些因素可能代表安全规划和风险检测的重要目标。