Department of Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Med Care. 2024 Oct 1;62(10):680-692. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002037. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
Over the past decade, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) funded multiple large-scale, comparative effectiveness clinical trials evaluating palliative care and advance care planning interventions. These are complex multicomponent interventions that need robust but flexible fidelity monitoring. Fidelity is necessary to maintain both internal and external validity within palliative care intervention research and to ultimately evaluate the real-world impact of high-quality interventions. Different trials not only took varying approaches to fidelity monitoring but also uncovered both unique and common challenges and facilitators. This article summarizes 8 of these trials and highlights approaches, adaptations, barriers, and facilitators for intervention fidelity monitoring. Identifying and delivering core elements while simultaneously allowing adaptations of noncore elements is a vital part of fidelity monitoring. Dissemination of such experiences can inform both future palliative care research as well as ongoing implementation of palliative care and advance care planning interventions across diverse clinical practices. Adoption of rigorous intervention fidelity methods is critical to advancing the science and reproducibility of palliative care interventions.
在过去的十年中,以患者为中心的医疗成果研究所(PCORI)资助了多项大规模的、比较有效性的临床试验,评估姑息治疗和预先医疗规划干预措施。这些都是复杂的多组成部分干预措施,需要强大但灵活的保真度监测。保真度对于维持姑息治疗干预研究的内部和外部有效性以及最终评估高质量干预措施的实际影响是必要的。不同的试验不仅对保真度监测采取了不同的方法,而且还发现了独特和共同的挑战和促进因素。本文总结了其中的 8 项试验,并强调了干预保真度监测的方法、适应性、障碍和促进因素。确定和提供核心要素,同时允许非核心要素的适应性,是保真度监测的重要部分。传播这些经验不仅可以为未来的姑息治疗研究提供信息,也可以为在不同的临床实践中姑息治疗和预先医疗规划干预措施的持续实施提供信息。采用严格的干预保真度方法对于推进姑息治疗干预措施的科学和可重复性至关重要。