Bickel Steven, Jensen Kai Oliver, Klingebiel Felix Karl-Ludwig, Teuben Michel Paul Johan, Pfeifer Roman, Pape Hans-Christoph, Hierholzer Christian, Kalbas Yannik
Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2975-2985. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02633-5. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
Although "tension-band wiring" is still commonly used to stabilize patellar fractures, the technique has recently been scrutinized due to biomechanical insufficiency. Consequently, the AO Foundation renamed the principle to compression cerclage wiring (CCW). Several studies propose favorable outcomes when utilizing locked plating (LP). This study aims to compare outcome of CCW and LP for complex patellar fractures.
A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed on patients who underwent operative treatment for (AO 34 C-Type) patellar fractures between April 2013 and March 2023. Patients with a 12 month follow up were included. We grouped and compared patients based on the applied treatment strategy: group LP vs. group CCW. Primary outcome parameters included implant-related complications and revision surgeries. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, return to work and 12 months functional outcome (Lysholm score). Odd ratios for complications and revisions were calculated using the conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimate. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Of 145 patients, 63 could be included (group LP: n = 23 and group CCW: n = 40). Fractures in group LP were significantly more complex in regard to AO Classification (p < 0.001), number of fragments (p < 0.001) and degree of comminution (p < 0.001), yet odds of complications were significantly lower in group LP (OR: 0.147; 95%CI: 0.015-0.742; p = 0.009). K-wire migration was the most common complication in group CCW (20%). Odds of revision surgery were significantly lower in group LP (OR: 0.000; 95%CI: 0.000-1.120; p = 0.041). The average Lysholm score at one year was favorable in both groups (89.8; SD: 11.9 in group LP and 90.6; SD: 9.3 in group CCW; n.s.).
In our study cohort, LP was routinely chosen for more complex fracture morphologies; nevertheless the data implies that LP may be considered as the superior fixation technique in regard to complications and revision operations. Especially, K-wire migration occurs frequently after CCW. The one year functional outcome was comparable between the groups, with both demonstrating good results. Prospective randomized studies are indicated to validate our findings.
尽管“张力带钢丝固定术”仍常用于髌骨骨折的固定,但由于生物力学方面的不足,该技术最近受到了审视。因此,AO基金会将这一原则重新命名为加压环扎钢丝固定术(CCW)。多项研究表明,使用锁定钢板(LP)可取得良好效果。本研究旨在比较CCW和LP治疗复杂髌骨骨折的效果。
对2013年4月至2023年3月间接受手术治疗(AO 34 C型)髌骨骨折的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究。纳入随访12个月的患者。我们根据应用的治疗策略对患者进行分组和比较:LP组与CCW组。主要结局参数包括植入物相关并发症和翻修手术。次要结局包括住院时间、恢复工作情况和12个月时的功能结局(Lysholm评分)。使用条件最大似然估计计算并发症和翻修手术的比值比。统计学显著性阈值设定为p < 0.05。
145例患者中,63例符合纳入标准(LP组:n = 23,CCW组:n = 40)。在AO分类(p < 0.001)、骨折块数量(p < 0.001)和粉碎程度(p < 0.001)方面,LP组的骨折明显更复杂,但LP组的并发症发生率显著更低(OR:0.147;95%CI:0.015 - 0.742;p = 0.009)。克氏针移位是CCW组最常见的并发症(20%)。LP组翻修手术的几率显著更低(OR:0.ooo;95%CI:0.000 - 1.120;p = 0.041)。两组患者1年时的平均Lysholm评分均良好(LP组为89.8;标准差:11.9,CCW组为90.6;标准差:9.3;无显著差异)。
在我们的研究队列中,对于更复杂的骨折形态通常选择LP;然而,数据表明在并发症和翻修手术方面,LP可能被视为更优的固定技术。特别是,CCW术后克氏针移位频繁发生。两组患者1年时功能结局相当,均显示出良好效果。需要进行前瞻性随机研究以验证我们的发现。