• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希伯来语词典项目（HeLP）。

HeLP: The Hebrew Lexicon project.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus Campus, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel.

BCBL, Basque Center of Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8761-8783. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4
PMID:39251528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525262/
Abstract

Lexicon projects (LPs) are large-scale data resources in different languages that present behavioral results from visual word recognition tasks. Analyses using LP data in multiple languages provide evidence regarding cross-linguistic differences as well as similarities in visual word recognition. Here we present the first LP in a Semitic language-the Hebrew Lexicon Project (HeLP). HeLP assembled lexical decision (LD) responses to 10,000 Hebrew words and nonwords, and naming responses to a subset of 5000 Hebrew words. We used the large-scale HeLP data to estimate the impact of general predictors (lexicality, frequency, word length, orthographic neighborhood density), and Hebrew-specific predictors (Semitic structure, presence of clitics, phonological entropy) of visual word recognition performance. Our results revealed the typical effects of lexicality and frequency obtained in many languages, but more complex impact of word length and neighborhood density. Considering Hebrew-specific characteristics, HeLP data revealed better recognition of words with a Semitic structure than words that do not conform to it, and a drop in performance for words comprising clitics. These effects varied, however, across LD and naming tasks. Lastly, a significant inhibitory effect of phonological ambiguity was found in both naming and LD. The implications of these findings for understanding reading in a Semitic language are discussed.

摘要

词汇项目 (Lexicon projects, LPs) 是不同语言的大型数据资源，呈现了视觉词汇识别任务的行为结果。使用多种语言的 LP 数据进行分析，为视觉词汇识别中的跨语言差异和相似性提供了证据。在这里，我们呈现了第一个闪米特语的 LP——希伯来语词汇项目 (Hebrew Lexicon Project, HeLP)。HeLP 收集了对 10000 个希伯来语单词和非单词的词汇判断 (lexical decision, LD) 反应，以及对 5000 个希伯来语单词的一部分的命名反应。我们使用大规模的 HeLP 数据来估计视觉词汇识别性能的一般预测因子 (词汇性、频率、词长、正字法邻近密度) 和希伯来语特定预测因子 (闪米特结构、存在词缀、语音熵) 的影响。我们的结果揭示了在许多语言中获得的词汇性和频率的典型影响，但词长和邻近密度的影响更为复杂。考虑到希伯来语的特点，HeLP 数据显示，具有闪米特结构的单词比不符合闪米特结构的单词更容易识别，而包含词缀的单词的性能则下降。然而，这些影响在 LD 和命名任务中有所不同。最后，在命名和 LD 中都发现了语音模糊性的显著抑制效应。讨论了这些发现对理解闪米特语阅读的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/c16417df4b24/13428_2024_2502_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/a3e8a88869a5/13428_2024_2502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/42e3e4c92327/13428_2024_2502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/1cd89fd1c308/13428_2024_2502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/a5d4d797e5b4/13428_2024_2502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/3da0be2a127c/13428_2024_2502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/0861addf71a8/13428_2024_2502_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/53acfc5eb2f3/13428_2024_2502_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/b6395a252c74/13428_2024_2502_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/c16417df4b24/13428_2024_2502_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/a3e8a88869a5/13428_2024_2502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/42e3e4c92327/13428_2024_2502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/1cd89fd1c308/13428_2024_2502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/a5d4d797e5b4/13428_2024_2502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/3da0be2a127c/13428_2024_2502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/0861addf71a8/13428_2024_2502_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/53acfc5eb2f3/13428_2024_2502_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/b6395a252c74/13428_2024_2502_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be8/11525262/c16417df4b24/13428_2024_2502_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
HeLP: The Hebrew Lexicon project.希伯来语词典项目（HeLP）。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8761-8783. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
The Developmental Lexicon Project: A behavioral database to investigate visual word recognition across the lifespan.发展词汇学项目：一个行为数据库，旨在研究整个生命周期中的视觉词汇识别。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2183-2203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0851-9.
3
The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew.字母位置灵活性的灵活性：来自阅读希伯来语时眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):1143-52. doi: 10.1037/a0031075. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
4
A developmental study of eye movements in Hebrew word reading: the effects of word familiarity, word length, and reading proficiency.希伯来语单词阅读中眼动的发展性研究：单词熟悉度、单词长度和阅读熟练度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1052755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052755. eCollection 2023.
5
Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.视觉单词识别策略与正字法深度：多语言比较
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Feb;13(1):104-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.104.
6
The role of the root in auditory word recognition of Hebrew.根在希伯来语听觉单词识别中的作用。
Cortex. 2019 Jul;116:286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?有内部结构和无内部结构的词：什么决定了正字法和形态处理的性质？
Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):141-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
8
Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.在词汇判断任务中对非单词的反应：来自英语词汇项目的见解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
9
The phonographic language network: Using network science to investigate the phonological and orthographic similarity structure of language.语音语言网络：利用网络科学研究语言的语音和正字法相似性结构。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Mar;148(3):475-500. doi: 10.1037/xge0000575.
10
A Principled Relation between Reading and Naming in Acquired and Developmental Anomia: Surface Dyslexia Following Impairment in the Phonological Output Lexicon.获得性和发育性失读症中阅读与命名之间的原则性关系：语音输出词汇受损后的表层失读症。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00340. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplified Chinese lexicon project: A lexical decision database with 8105 characters and 4864 pseudocharacters.简体中文字典项目：一个包含8105个汉字和4864个假字的词汇判断数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 23;57(7):206. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02701-7.
2
Kalimah norms: Ratings for 2,467 modern standard Arabic words on two scales.卡里玛规范：2467个现代标准阿拉伯语单词在两个量表上的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 9;57(7):194. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02692-5.
3
Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.

本文引用的文献

1
PONG: A computational model of visual word recognition through bihemispheric activation.PONG：一种通过双半球激活实现视觉单词识别的计算模型。
Psychol Rev. 2025 Apr;132(3):505-527. doi: 10.1037/rev0000461. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
The contribution of consonants and vowels to auditory word recognition is shaped by language-specific properties: Evidence from Hebrew.辅音和元音对听觉单词识别的贡献受特定语言属性的影响：来自希伯来语的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 May;48(5):401-426. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001000. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
The Persian Lexicon Project: minimized orthographic neighbourhood effects in a dense language.
吉瓦尔：一个包含40种语言的词邻域度量的数据库和计算器。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 19;57(3):98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02612-7.
波斯语词典项目：在一种密集语言中最小化正字法邻域效应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):957-979. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09863-x. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
4
Culture is not destiny, for reading: highlighting variable routes to literacy within writing systems.文化并非命运：阅读的多样性——文字系统内的读写能力形成途径。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Jul;1513(1):31-47. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14768. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Quantifying the regularities between orthography and semantics and their impact on group- and individual-level behavior.量化拼写和语义之间的规律及其对群体和个体行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;48(6):839-855. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001109. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
6
Frequency and predictability effects in first and second language of different script bilinguals.不同文字系统双语者在第一语言和第二语言中的频率和可预测性效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Sep;48(9):1363-1383. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000927. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Order among chaos: Cross-linguistic differences and developmental trajectories in pseudoword reading aloud using pronunciation Entropy.混沌中的有序：使用发音熵的默读假词的跨语言差异和发展轨迹。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251629. eCollection 2021.
8
subs2vec: Word embeddings from subtitles in 55 languages.subs2vec：来自 55 种语言字幕的单词嵌入。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr;53(2):629-655. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01406-3.
9
Morphological decomposition compensates for imperfections in phonological decoding. Neural evidence from typical and dyslexic readers of an opaque orthography.形态分解弥补了语音解码中的缺陷。来自不透明正字法的典型读者和阅读障碍读者的神经学证据。
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:172-191. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
10
Consistency norms for 37,677 english words.一致性规范，适用于 37677 个英文单词。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2535-2555. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01391-7.