Centre for Physical Activity in Health and Disease, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH, Uxbridge, UK.
Division of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, UB8 3PH, Uxbridge, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05310-9.
Sarcopenia leads to functional disability, dependence in activities of daily living (ADL), and is a key contributor to frailty. Reducing and breaking up sedentary time is associated with improved sarcopenia and frailty-related outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of delivering and evaluating a remote sedentary behaviour intervention to improve sarcopenia and independent living in older adults with frailty.
A two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial was conducted with a target of 60 older adults (mean age 74 ± 6 years) with very mild or mild frailty. Participants were randomised to the Frail-LESS (LEss Sitting and Sarcopenia in Frail older adults) intervention or usual care control group for six months. The intervention included tailored feedback on sitting, standing and stepping; an education workbook that included goal setting and action planning; one-to-one health coaching; peer support; and a wearable device to self-monitor sedentary behaviour. Participant recruitment (percentage of eligible individuals recruited), retention and data completion rates were used to assess trial feasibility. Acceptability of the trial was explored through interviews and safety was evaluated via unplanned healthcare utilisation and number of falls. Sitting, standing, stepping and sarcopenia were measured to evaluate potential intervention effects.
Sixty participants were recruited. Recruitment and retention rates were 72% and 83%, respectively. Completion rates for outcome measures ranged from 70 to 100%. The trial was safe (< 1 fall per participant on average at each timepoint) and trial procedures were acceptable. Descriptive analysis (mean ± SD) showed that daily sitting was 25.1 ± 82.1 min/day lower in the intervention group, and 6.4 ± 60.5 min/day higher in the control group, at 6 months compared with baseline. Hand grip strength and sit-to-stand score were improved by 1.3 ± 2.4 kg and 0.7 ± 1.0, respectively, in the intervention group.
This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of delivering and evaluating a remote intervention to reduce and break up sitting in older adults with frailty. The intervention showed evidence towards reducing daily sitting and improving sarcopenia, supporting its evaluation in a definitive randomised controlled trial.
ISRCTN registry (registration number: ISRCTN17158017). Registered 6th August 2021.
肌少症导致功能障碍、日常生活活动(ADL)依赖,并是导致虚弱的关键因素。减少久坐时间并打破久坐习惯与改善肌少症和虚弱相关结局有关。本研究旨在确定为虚弱的老年人提供并评估远程久坐行为干预以改善肌少症和独立生活的可行性。
进行了一项两臂随机对照可行性试验,目标人群为 60 名(平均年龄 74±6 岁)非常轻度或轻度虚弱的老年人。参与者随机分配到 Frail-LESS(虚弱老年人中久坐和肌少症减少)干预组或常规护理对照组,干预时间为 6 个月。干预措施包括针对久坐、站立和行走的个性化反馈;一本包括目标设定和行动计划的教育手册;一对一健康指导;同伴支持;以及一个可自我监测久坐行为的可穿戴设备。通过招募符合条件的个体比例(招募的合格个体百分比)、保留率和数据完成率来评估试验的可行性。通过访谈探讨了试验的可接受性,通过意外的医疗保健利用和跌倒次数评估了安全性。测量了参与者的坐姿、站立、行走和肌少症情况,以评估潜在的干预效果。
共招募了 60 名参与者。招募率和保留率分别为 72%和 83%。各项结局测量的完成率在 70%至 100%之间。试验是安全的(平均每名参与者每个时间点的跌倒次数少于 1 次),试验程序是可接受的。描述性分析(均值±标准差)显示,与基线相比,干预组的每日久坐时间减少了 25.1±82.1 分钟,对照组增加了 6.4±60.5 分钟,在 6 个月时。干预组握力提高了 1.3±2.4 公斤,从坐到站的评分提高了 0.7±1.0。
本研究证明了为虚弱的老年人提供和评估减少和打破久坐习惯的远程干预的可行性和安全性。该干预措施显示出减少日常久坐时间和改善肌少症的证据,支持其在一项确定性随机对照试验中进行评估。
ISRCTN 注册(注册号:ISRCTN81446634)。2021 年 8 月 6 日注册。