Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
City of Greater Bendigo, Galkangu Bendigo, VIC, 189-229 Lyttleton Terrace, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Sep 10;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02266-5.
Local governments have a critical role to play in addressing health inequities. Health equity impact assessments are recommended to help governments apply an equity lens to the development and implementation of policies and programs. Despite evidence of equity-positive benefits of such tools, adoption remains limited, prompting calls for evaluations to assess their impact and identify factors that will promote uptake across various contexts.
We conducted a mixed method study to evaluate the impact of an equity impact assessment (EIA) tool and process on policies and organisational capacity in a local government in Victoria, Australia, and identify factors that influenced this impact. We analysed 33 documents related to 18 EIAs, and conducted surveys (n = 40) and in-depth interviews (n = 17) with staff involved in EIAs.
Almost all (17 of 18) EIAs resulted in equity-positive changes to policies and programs, most frequently addressing individual-level factors, such as making community communications and consultations more accessible to under-represented or under-served groups. Structural-level recommendations from one EIA, such as increasing diversity in decision-making panels, were found to impact both the current policy and a broad range of future, related projects and services. Improvements in equity-centric organisational culture and capacity (including staff awareness, skills and confidence) and increased engagement with under-represented communities were also reported. Factors perceived to influence the impact of EIA's related to organisational commitment and capacity to prioritise equity, process-level factors related to the type and timing of EIAs, and extent of implementation support.
Our study supports wider uptake of health equity impact assessments in local government policies and programs. Legislation, leadership and resources from upper-tiers of government can help increase the adoption of equity tools to reduce disparities in population health.
地方政府在解决健康不平等问题方面发挥着关键作用。建议进行健康公平影响评估,以帮助政府在制定和实施政策和计划时采用公平视角。尽管这些工具具有公平积极的益处的证据,但采用仍然有限,促使人们呼吁进行评估,以评估其影响并确定在各种情况下促进采用的因素。
我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以评估在澳大利亚维多利亚州的一个地方政府中,公平影响评估(EIA)工具和流程对政策和组织能力的影响,并确定影响这种影响的因素。我们分析了与 18 项 EIA 相关的 33 份文件,并对参与 EIA 的工作人员进行了调查(n=40)和深入访谈(n=17)。
几乎所有(18 项中的 17 项)EIA 都导致政策和计划朝着公平积极的方向发生变化,最常见的是解决个人层面的因素,例如使社区沟通和协商更容易被代表性不足或服务不足的群体获得。一项 EIA 的结构性建议,例如增加决策小组的多样性,被发现不仅影响当前政策,还影响广泛的未来相关项目和服务。还报告了公平为中心的组织文化和能力(包括员工意识、技能和信心)的改善,以及与代表性不足的社区的更多接触。被认为影响 EIA 影响的因素与组织对公平的承诺和能力、与 EIA 的类型和时间有关的过程因素以及实施支持的程度有关。
我们的研究支持在地方政府政策和计划中更广泛地采用健康公平影响评估。上级政府的立法、领导和资源可以帮助增加对公平工具的采用,以减少人口健康方面的差距。