Suppr超能文献

开发并测试一种基于社区的、线上与面对面同伴主导的干预措施,以改善柬埔寨成年身体残疾者的心理健康状况。

Developing and testing a community based, online vs. face-to-face peer led intervention to improve mental well-being in Cambodian adults with physical disabilities.

作者信息

Best Paul, Maddock Alan, Ean Nil, Montgomery Lorna, Armour Cherie, Mulholland Ciaran, Blair Carolyn

机构信息

Centre for Technological Innovation, Mental Health and Education (TIME), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2024 Aug 27;6:1372062. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1372062. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing international attention, there remains an urgent need to develop mental health services within low and middle income countries. The Khmer Rouge period in Cambodia saw the destruction of all health services infrastructure in the 1970s. Consequently, Cambodia has struggled to rebuild both its economy and healthcare system, with the number of qualified mental health clinicians remaining disproportionately low. Resultantly, there is a pressing need to develop low-cost community based alternatives of mental healthcare.

METHODS

Using a mixed methods design, researchers developed an 8-week peer-led intervention, known as a Friendship Group, for adults with physical disabilities using both face-to-face and online delivery methods. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to assess changes in pre-post survey scores and qualitative data was collected in form of five focus groups post intervention.

RESULTS

41 participants were allocated across four Friendship groups - two were online and two face-to-face. Attrition rate was 22% post-intervention ( = 32). ITT analyses showed a statistically significant decrease in psychological distress scores [ = -3.808,  < .001] from pre [Mdn = 20, IQR = 16.5-25.5] to post [Mdn = 16, IQR = 14-18.5] intervention. A Wilcoxon signed-ranks test also showed a statistically significant decrease in PTSD scores [ = -2.239,  < .025] from pre [Mdn = 4, IQR = 3-5] to post [Mdn = 3, IQR = 2.75-4] intervention. There was also a statistically significant decrease in worry scores [ = -3.904,  < .001] from pre [Mdn = 5, IQR = 3.5-6.5] to post [Mdn = 3, IQR = 3-4] intervention. There were no significant group differences between the face to face and online groups. A number of interconnected themes emerged from focus group data ( = 5), these included the mental health benefits of Friendship Groups as conceptualised through knowledge acquisition, skill development and peer support.

CONCLUSIONS

The Friendship group intervention delivered in both online and face-to-face formats appears feasible and acceptable within the Cambodian context. Initial data revealed positive findings in terms of reduction in psychological distress, worry and PTSD symptoms as well increased feeling as calm.

摘要

背景

尽管国际社会对此的关注日益增加,但中低收入国家仍迫切需要发展心理健康服务。柬埔寨的红色高棉时期导致20世纪70年代所有医疗服务基础设施遭到破坏。因此,柬埔寨一直在努力重建其经济和医疗体系,合格的心理健康临床医生数量仍然极低。因此,迫切需要开发低成本的社区心理健康替代方案。

方法

研究人员采用混合方法设计,为身体残疾的成年人开发了一种为期8周的同伴主导干预措施,称为友谊小组,采用面对面和在线两种方式进行。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来评估前后调查分数的变化,并在干预后通过五个焦点小组的形式收集定性数据。

结果

41名参与者被分配到四个友谊小组中——两个是在线小组,两个是面对面小组。干预后的流失率为22%(n = 32)。意向性分析显示,从干预前[中位数 = 20,四分位距 = 16.5 - 25.5]到干预后[中位数 = 16,四分位距 = 14 - 18.5],心理困扰得分有统计学显著下降[Z = -3.808,p <.001]。Wilcoxon符号秩检验还显示,从干预前[中位数 = 4,四分位距 = 3 - 5]到干预后[中位数 = 3,四分位距 = 2.75 - 4],创伤后应激障碍得分有统计学显著下降[Z = -2.239,p <.025]。从干预前[中位数 = 5,四分位距 = 3.5 - 6.5]到干预后[中位数 = 3,四分位距 = 3 - 4],担忧得分也有统计学显著下降[Z = -3.904,p <.001]。面对面小组和在线小组之间没有显著的组间差异。焦点小组数据(n = 5)中出现了一些相互关联的主题,这些主题包括通过知识获取、技能发展和同伴支持所概念化的友谊小组对心理健康的益处。

结论

以在线和面对面形式提供的友谊小组干预在柬埔寨背景下似乎是可行且可接受的。初步数据显示,在减轻心理困扰、担忧和创伤后应激障碍症状以及增强平静感方面有积极发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fe7/11385004/8705f815118b/fdgth-06-1372062-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验