• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简短思维漫游三因素量表(BMW-3)。

The brief mind wandering three-factor scale (BMW-3).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8720-8744. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02500-6. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02500-6
PMID:39259475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525255/
Abstract

In recent years, researchers from different fields have become increasingly interested in measuring individual differences in mind wandering as a psychological trait. Although there are several questionnaires that allow for an assessment of people's perceptions of their mind wandering experiences, they either define mind wandering in a very broad sense or do not sufficiently separate different aspects of mind wandering. Here, we introduce the Brief Mind Wandering Three-Factor Scale (BMW-3), a 12-item questionnaire available in German and English. The BMW-3 conceptualizes mind wandering as task-unrelated thought and measures three dimensions of mind wandering: unintentional mind wandering, intentional mind wandering, and meta-awareness of mind wandering. Based on results from 1038 participants (823 German speakers, 215 English speakers), we found support for the proposed three-factorial structure of mind wandering and for scalar measurement invariance of the German and English versions. All subscales showed good internal consistencies and moderate to high test-retest correlations and thus provide an effective assessment of individual differences in mind wandering. Moreover, the BMW-3 showed good convergent validity when compared to existing retrospective measures of mind wandering and mindfulness and was related to conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness as well as self-reported attentional control. Lastly, it predicted the propensity for mind wandering inside and outside the lab (as assessed by in-the-moment experience sampling), the frequency of experiencing depressive symptoms, and the use of functional and dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies. All in all, the BMW-3 provides a brief, reliable, and valid assessment of mind wandering for basic and clinical research.

摘要

近年来,不同领域的研究人员越来越关注将个体在思维漫游方面的差异作为一种心理特征进行测量。虽然有几种问卷可以评估人们对思维漫游体验的感知,但它们要么将思维漫游定义为非常广泛的概念,要么没有充分区分思维漫游的不同方面。在这里,我们引入了简短思维漫游三因素量表(BMW-3),这是一种 12 项的德语和英语问卷。BMW-3 将思维漫游概念化为与任务无关的思维,并测量思维漫游的三个维度:无意识思维漫游、有意思维漫游和对思维漫游的元认知。基于对 1038 名参与者(823 名德语使用者,215 名英语使用者)的结果,我们支持了思维漫游的三因素结构和德语及英语版本的标度测量不变性。所有子量表均表现出良好的内部一致性和中等至高度的重测信度,因此为思维漫游的个体差异提供了有效的评估。此外,与现有的思维漫游和正念的回溯性测量相比,BMW-3 具有较好的聚合效度,并与尽责性、情绪稳定性和开放性以及自我报告的注意力控制有关。最后,它预测了实验室内外思维漫游的倾向(通过即时体验抽样评估)、经历抑郁症状的频率以及功能和非功能情绪调节策略的使用。总之,BMW-3 为基础和临床研究提供了一种简短、可靠和有效的思维漫游评估方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/484cd78787db/13428_2024_2500_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/f8498bcd5c13/13428_2024_2500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/07c7dcf8c7e4/13428_2024_2500_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/f467df05af26/13428_2024_2500_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/484cd78787db/13428_2024_2500_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/f8498bcd5c13/13428_2024_2500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/07c7dcf8c7e4/13428_2024_2500_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/f467df05af26/13428_2024_2500_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d51/11525255/484cd78787db/13428_2024_2500_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The brief mind wandering three-factor scale (BMW-3).简短思维漫游三因素量表(BMW-3)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8720-8744. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02500-6. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Mindfulness and mind wandering: The protective effects of brief meditation in anxious individuals.正念与走神:简短冥想对焦虑个体的保护作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
3
Wandering in both mind and body: individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting.身心游离:思维游荡和注意力不集中的个体差异预示着坐立不安。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):19-31. doi: 10.1037/a0031438.
4
Validation of the German Version of the Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS-G).验证过度漫游量表(MEWS-G)的德语版本。
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2021 Dec;89(12):607-616. doi: 10.1055/a-1362-9743. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Measuring mind wandering with experience sampling during task performance: An item response theory investigation.在任务执行期间使用经验采样测量思维漫游:项目反应理论研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7707-7727. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02446-9. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
6
Who is prone to wander and when? Examining an integrative effect of working memory capacity and mindfulness trait on mind wandering under different task loads.谁容易走神,什么时候容易走神?考察工作记忆容量和正念特质在不同任务负荷下对思维 wandered 的综合影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Aug;63:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.思维漫游者,以及何时在实验室和日常生活环境中变化。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1271-1289. doi: 10.1177/0956797617706086. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Further unpacking individual differences in mind wandering: The role of emotional valence and awareness.进一步剖析思维漫游中的个体差异:情绪效价和意识的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Jul;122:103697. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103697. Epub 2024 May 31.
9
[Development of Japanese versions of the Daydream Frequency Scale and the Mind Wandering Questionnaire].[白日梦频率量表和思维游荡问卷日语版本的编制]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2016 Apr;87(1):79-88. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.87.14223.
10
How pervasive is mind wandering, really?思维漫游到底有多普遍?
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Nov;66:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological momentary assessment of mind-wandering: meta-analysis and systematic review.心智游移的生态瞬间评估:元分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 18;13(1):2873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29854-9.
2
Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review.自我捕捉方法测量元意识下的心流:系统综述。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Feb;108:103463. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
3
Do Attentional Lapses Account for the Worst Performance Rule?注意力不集中能否解释最差表现规则?
J Intell. 2021 Dec 24;10(1):2. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10010002.
4
Mind wandering and depression: A status report.心 wandered 与 depression:A status report.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Feb;133:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
The : Content, Construct, and Clinical Validity.内容、结构与临床效度。
Assessment. 2023 Mar;30(2):433-447. doi: 10.1177/10731911211058688. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Mind-Wandering Mediates the Associations Between Neuroticism and Conscientiousness, and Tendencies Towards Smartphone Use Disorder.走神介导了神经质与尽责性以及智能手机使用障碍倾向之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 30;12:661541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661541. eCollection 2021.
7
How consistent is mind wandering across situations and tasks? A latent state-trait analysis.思维游荡在不同情境和任务中表现出多大程度的一致性?一项潜在状态-特质分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(10):1385-1399. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001041. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Personality and Mind-Wandering Self-Perception: The Role of Meta-Awareness.人格与心流自我认知:元意识的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 15;12:581129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581129. eCollection 2021.
9
Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.检验探测性思维漫游报告的竞争测量方法的构念效度。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2372-2411. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Are individual differences in attention control related to working memory capacity? A latent variable mega-analysis.注意力控制方面的个体差异与工作记忆容量有关吗?一项潜在变量元分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Nov 19. doi: 10.1037/xge0001000.