Centre for Sport Nutrition and Health, Centre for Nutritional Ecology, School of Physical Education (Main Campus), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Henan Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Center, Henan Sport University, Zhengzhou 450044, China.
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 5;16(17):3007. doi: 10.3390/nu16173007.
Exercise and dietary interventions are essential for maintaining weight and reducing fat accumulation. With the growing popularity of various dietary strategies, evidence suggests that combining exercise with dietary interventions offers greater benefits than either approach alone. Consequently, this combined strategy has become a preferred method for many individuals aiming to maintain health. Calorie restriction, 5/2 intermittent fasting, time-restricted feeding, and the ketogenic diet are among the most popular dietary interventions today. Aerobic exercise, resistance training, and mixed exercise are the most widely practiced forms of physical activity. Exploring the best combinations of these approaches to determine which yields the most effective results is both meaningful and valuable. Despite this trend, a comparative analysis of the effects of different exercise and diet combinations is lacking. This study uses network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of various combined interventions on body composition and to compare their efficacy.
We systematically reviewed literature from database inception through May 2024, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The study was registered in PROSPERO under the title: "Effects of Exercise Combined with Different Dietary Interventions on Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis" (identifier: CRD42024542184). Studies were meticulously selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria (The included studies must be randomized controlled trials involving healthy adults aged 18 to 65 years. Articles were rigorously screened according to the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.), and their risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were aggregated and analyzed using network meta-analysis, with intervention efficacy ranked by Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) curves.
The network meta-analysis included 78 randomized controlled trials with 5219 participants, comparing the effects of four combined interventions: exercise with calorie restriction (CR+EX), exercise with time-restricted eating (TRF+EX), exercise with 5/2 intermittent fasting (5/2F+EX), and exercise with a ketogenic diet (KD+EX) on body composition. Intervention efficacy ranking was as follows: (1) Weight Reduction: CR+EX > KD+EX > TRF+EX > 5/2F+EX (Relative to CR+EX, the effect sizes of 5/2F+EX, TRF+EX and KD+EX are 2.94 (-3.64, 9.52); 2.37 (-0.40, 5.15); 1.80 (-1.75, 5.34)). (2) BMI: CR+EX > KD+EX > 5/2F+EX > TRF+EX (Relative to CR+EX, the effect sizes of 5/2F+EX, TRF+EX and KD+EX are 1.95 (-0.49, 4.39); 2.20 (1.08, 3.32); 1.23 (-0.26, 2.71)). (3) Body Fat Percentage: CR+EX > 5/2F+EX > TRF+EX > KD+EX (Relative to CR+EX, the effect sizes of 5/2F+EX, TRF+EX and KD+EX are 2.66 (-1.56, 6.89); 2.84 (0.56, 5.13); 3.14 (0.52, 5.75).). (4) Lean Body Mass in Male: CR+EX > TRF+EX > KD+EX (Relative to CR+EX, the effect sizes of TRF+EX and KD+EX are -1.60 (-6.98, 3.78); -2.76 (-7.93, 2.40)). (5) Lean Body Mass in Female: TRF+EX > CR+EX > 5/2F+EX > KD+EX (Relative to TRF+EX, the effect sizes of CR+EX, 5/2F+EX and KD+EX are -0.52 (-2.58, 1.55); -1.83 (-4.71, 1.04); -2.46 (-5.69,0.76).).
Calorie restriction combined with exercise emerged as the most effective strategy for reducing weight and fat percentage while maintaining lean body mass. For women, combining exercise with time-restricted eating proved optimal for preserving muscle mass. While combining exercise with a ketogenic diet effectively reduces weight, it is comparatively less effective at decreasing fat percentage and preserving lean body mass. Hence, the ketogenic diet combined with exercise is considered suboptimal.
运动和饮食干预对于维持体重和减少脂肪积累至关重要。随着各种饮食策略的日益普及,有证据表明,运动与饮食干预相结合比单独使用任何一种方法都能带来更大的益处。因此,这种联合策略已成为许多旨在保持健康的人的首选方法。限制热量摄入、5/2 间歇性禁食、限时进食和生酮饮食是当今最受欢迎的饮食干预措施之一。有氧运动、抗阻训练和混合运动是最广泛实践的身体活动形式。探索这些方法的最佳组合,以确定哪种方法最有效,既具有意义又有价值。尽管存在这种趋势,但缺乏对不同运动和饮食组合效果的比较分析。本研究使用网络荟萃分析来评估各种联合干预措施对身体成分的影响,并比较其疗效。
我们系统地检索了从数据库建立到 2024 年 5 月的文献,检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library。该研究在 PROSPERO 中以“Exercise Combined with Different Dietary Interventions on Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis”(标识符:CRD42024542184)为题进行了注册。研究根据特定的纳入和排除标准(纳入研究必须是涉及 18 至 65 岁健康成年人的随机对照试验。文章根据指定的纳入和排除标准进行了严格筛选)进行了精心选择,并用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了其偏倚风险。使用网络荟萃分析对数据进行汇总和分析,通过累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)曲线对干预效果进行排名。
网络荟萃分析包括 78 项随机对照试验,共 5219 名参与者,比较了四种联合干预措施的效果:运动与热量限制(CR+EX)、运动与限时进食(TRF+EX)、运动与 5/2 间歇性禁食(5/2F+EX)和运动与生酮饮食(KD+EX)对身体成分的影响。干预效果的排名如下:(1)体重减轻:CR+EX>KD+EX>TRF+EX>5/2F+EX(与 CR+EX 相比,5/2F+EX、TRF+EX 和 KD+EX 的效果大小分别为 2.94(-3.64,9.52);2.37(-0.40,5.15);1.80(-1.75,5.34))。(2)BMI:CR+EX>KD+EX>5/2F+EX>TRF+EX(与 CR+EX 相比,5/2F+EX、TRF+EX 和 KD+EX 的效果大小分别为 1.95(-0.49,4.39);2.20(1.08,3.32);1.23(-0.26,2.71))。(3)体脂肪百分比:CR+EX>5/2F+EX>TRF+EX>KD+EX(与 CR+EX 相比,5/2F+EX、TRF+EX 和 KD+EX 的效果大小分别为 2.66(-1.56,6.89);2.84(0.56,5.13);3.14(0.52,5.75))。(4)男性瘦体重:CR+EX>TRF+EX>KD+EX(与 CR+EX 相比,TRF+EX 和 KD+EX 的效果大小分别为-1.60(-6.98,3.78);-2.76(-7.93,2.40))。(5)女性瘦体重:TRF+EX>CR+EX>5/2F+EX>KD+EX(与 TRF+EX 相比,CR+EX、5/2F+EX 和 KD+EX 的效果大小分别为-0.52(-2.58,1.55);-1.83(-4.71,1.04);-2.46(-5.69,0.76))。
限制热量摄入与运动相结合是减轻体重和脂肪百分比、同时保持瘦体重的最有效策略。对于女性,运动与限时进食相结合是保持肌肉质量的最佳选择。虽然运动与生酮饮食相结合可有效减轻体重,但在降低脂肪百分比和保持瘦体重方面的效果相对较差。因此,生酮饮食与运动相结合的效果不理想。