Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Program Rehabilitation & Development, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;24(17):5549. doi: 10.3390/s24175549.
Pressure-relieving footwear helps prevent foot ulcers in people with diabetes. The footwear design contributes to this effect and includes the insole top cover. We aimed to assess the offloading effect of materials commonly used as insole top cover. We measured 20 participants with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy for in-shoe peak pressures while walking in their prescribed footwear with the insole covered with eight different materials, tested in randomized order. Top covers were a 3 mm or 6 mm thick open or closed-cell foam or a 6 mm thick combination of open- and closed-cell foams. We re-assessed pressures after one month of using the top cover. Peak pressures were assessed per anatomical foot region and a region of interest (i.e., previous ulceration or high barefoot pressure). Walking comfort was assessed using a 10-point Likert scale. Mean peak pressure at the region of interest varied between 167 (SD:56) and 186 (SD:65) kPa across top covers ( < 0.001) and was significantly higher for the 3 mm thick PPT than for four of the seven 6 mm thick top covers. Across 6 mm thick top covers, only two showed a significant peak pressure difference between them. Over time, peak pressures changed non-significantly from -2.7 to +47.8 kPa across top cover conditions. Comfort ratings were 8.0 to 8.4 across top covers ( = 0.863). The 6 mm thick foams provided more pressure relief than the 3 mm thick foam during walking in high-risk people with diabetes. Between the 6 mm thick foams and over time, only small differences exist. The choice of which 6 mm thick insole top cover to use may be determined more by availability, durability, ease of use, costs, or hygienic properties than by superiority in pressure-relief capacity.
减压鞋有助于预防糖尿病患者的足部溃疡。鞋类设计对此效果有贡献,包括鞋垫顶罩。我们旨在评估常用作鞋垫顶罩的材料的减压效果。我们测量了 20 名患有糖尿病和周围神经病变的参与者,让他们在穿着规定的鞋子行走时,在鞋垫上覆盖八种不同材料的情况下测量鞋内峰值压力,测试按随机顺序进行。顶罩为 3 毫米或 6 毫米厚的开孔或闭孔泡沫或 6 毫米厚的开孔和闭孔泡沫组合。在使用顶罩一个月后,我们重新评估了压力。根据解剖足部区域和感兴趣区域(即以前的溃疡或高赤脚压力)评估峰值压力。使用 10 分制 Likert 量表评估步行舒适度。在不同的顶罩之间,感兴趣区域的平均峰值压力在 167(SD:56)和 186(SD:65)kPa 之间(<0.001),3 毫米厚的 PPT 明显高于七个 6 毫米厚顶罩中的四个。在 6 毫米厚的顶罩中,只有两个之间的峰值压力存在显著差异。随着时间的推移,在顶罩条件下,峰值压力从-2.7 到+47.8 kPa 变化不显著。舒适度评分为 8.0 到 8.4(=0.863)。在高风险的糖尿病患者行走时,6 毫米厚的泡沫比 3 毫米厚的泡沫提供了更多的减压效果。在 6 毫米厚的泡沫之间,随着时间的推移,只有微小的差异。选择使用哪种 6 毫米厚的鞋垫顶罩可能更多地取决于可用性、耐用性、易用性、成本或卫生性能,而不是减压能力的优势。