Suppr超能文献

下一个评估时代的效度:后果、社会影响与公平性

Validity in the Next Era of Assessment: Consequences, Social Impact, and Equity.

作者信息

Kinnear Benjamin, St-Onge Christina, Schumacher Daniel J, Marceau Mélanie, Naidu Thirusha

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Department of Medicine, Researcher at the Center for Health Sciences Pedagogy, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;13(1):452-459. doi: 10.5334/pme.1150. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Validity has long held a venerated place in education, leading some authors to refer to it as the "sine qua non" or "cardinal virtue" of assessment. And yet, validity has not held a fixed meaning; rather it has shifted in its definition and scope over time. In this Eye Opener, the authors explore if and how current conceptualizations of validity fit a next era of assessment that prioritizes patient care and learner equity. They posit that health profession education's conceptualization of validity will change in three related but distinct ways. First, consequences of assessment decisions will play a central role in validity arguments. Second, validity evidence regarding impacts of assessment on patients and society will be prioritized. Third, equity will be seen as part of validity rather than an unrelated concept. The authors argue that health professions education has the agency to change its ideology around validity, and to align with values that predominate the next era of assessment such as high-quality care and equity for learners and patients.

摘要

效度在教育领域长期以来一直占据着备受尊崇的地位,这使得一些作者将其称为评估的“必要条件”或“主要优点”。然而,效度并没有一个固定的含义;相反,随着时间的推移,它在定义和范围上发生了变化。在这篇《开眼界》文章中,作者探讨了当前效度概念是否以及如何适用于一个优先考虑患者护理和学习者公平性的评估新时代。他们认为,卫生职业教育对效度的概念化将以三种相关但不同的方式发生变化。首先,评估决策的后果将在效度论证中发挥核心作用。其次,关于评估对患者和社会影响的效度证据将被优先考虑。第三,公平将被视为效度的一部分,而不是一个不相关的概念。作者认为,卫生职业教育有能力改变其围绕效度的理念,并与主导评估新时代的价值观保持一致,如为学习者和患者提供高质量护理和公平性。

相似文献

2
Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative.将有效性作为一项社会要务来把握的八种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):100-103. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77727. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Medical Education's Wicked Problem: Achieving Equity in Assessment for Medical Learners.医学教育的棘手问题:实现医学学习者评估中的公平。
Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12S Addressing Harmful Bias and Eliminating Discrimination in Health Professions Learning Environments):S98-S108. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003717.
7
Validation of learning assessments: A primer.学习评估的验证:入门指南。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
8
Strategies for Advancing Equity in Frontline Clinical Assessment.推进一线临床评估公平性的策略。
Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8S):S57-S63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005246. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings.有效性:一个词有多种含义。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):853-867. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing the Next Era in Assessment.开启评估的新时代。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jan 9;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.5334/pme.1551. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

10
Strategies for Advancing Equity in Frontline Clinical Assessment.推进一线临床评估公平性的策略。
Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8S):S57-S63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005246. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验