Kinnear Benjamin, St-Onge Christina, Schumacher Daniel J, Marceau Mélanie, Naidu Thirusha
Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Department of Medicine, Researcher at the Center for Health Sciences Pedagogy, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;13(1):452-459. doi: 10.5334/pme.1150. eCollection 2024.
Validity has long held a venerated place in education, leading some authors to refer to it as the "sine qua non" or "cardinal virtue" of assessment. And yet, validity has not held a fixed meaning; rather it has shifted in its definition and scope over time. In this Eye Opener, the authors explore if and how current conceptualizations of validity fit a next era of assessment that prioritizes patient care and learner equity. They posit that health profession education's conceptualization of validity will change in three related but distinct ways. First, consequences of assessment decisions will play a central role in validity arguments. Second, validity evidence regarding impacts of assessment on patients and society will be prioritized. Third, equity will be seen as part of validity rather than an unrelated concept. The authors argue that health professions education has the agency to change its ideology around validity, and to align with values that predominate the next era of assessment such as high-quality care and equity for learners and patients.
效度在教育领域长期以来一直占据着备受尊崇的地位,这使得一些作者将其称为评估的“必要条件”或“主要优点”。然而,效度并没有一个固定的含义;相反,随着时间的推移,它在定义和范围上发生了变化。在这篇《开眼界》文章中,作者探讨了当前效度概念是否以及如何适用于一个优先考虑患者护理和学习者公平性的评估新时代。他们认为,卫生职业教育对效度的概念化将以三种相关但不同的方式发生变化。首先,评估决策的后果将在效度论证中发挥核心作用。其次,关于评估对患者和社会影响的效度证据将被优先考虑。第三,公平将被视为效度的一部分,而不是一个不相关的概念。作者认为,卫生职业教育有能力改变其围绕效度的理念,并与主导评估新时代的价值观保持一致,如为学习者和患者提供高质量护理和公平性。