Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;116(6):1521-1524. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3443. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Regulators increasingly rely on real-world evidence generated from routine-care health data to evaluate novel therapies. Particularly, external control arms are increasingly used to supplement and contextualize efficacy and safety claims of single arm clinical trials for rare disease therapies. However, there are a number of methodological issues that may affect the validity of results derived from such comparisons. In this mini-review, we briefly summarize frequently used approaches and outline some of the most important criticisms and paths forward.
监管机构越来越依赖于常规护理健康数据中产生的真实世界证据来评估新疗法。特别是,外部对照臂越来越多地用于补充和说明罕见病疗法的单臂临床试验的疗效和安全性主张。然而,有许多方法学问题可能会影响此类比较得出的结果的有效性。在这个小型综述中,我们简要总结了常用的方法,并概述了一些最重要的批评意见和前进的方向。