Suppr超能文献

[德国专科门诊及(部分)住院疼痛医学护理的地区比较]

[Regional comparison of specialized outpatient and (partial) inpatient pain medicine care in Germany].

作者信息

Erlenwein Joachim, Buchholz Johanna, Weißmann Christoph, Hennig Beata, Marschall Ursula, Sumpf Eberhardt, Nolte Johannes, Petzke Frank

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Zentrale Abteilung Physiotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2024 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00829-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Chronic pain requires graduated and staged levels of care. The aim of this study is to provide a regional overview regarding the accessibility of specialized outpatient and (partial) inpatient pain medicine care from the patient's perspective in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 1000 model patients randomly generated from German postal code location combinations, the travelling time by car (individual transport, IT) and available public transport connections (PTC) to the nearest specialized outpatient and inpatient pain medicine clinics and units were assessed using a route planner.

RESULTS

Outpatient facilities (in a practice setting) were mostly realistically accessible depending on the proportion of pain treatment and the networking structure. University pain outpatient clinics were at a critically reachable distance with IT for 70% of the patients (80% with PTC) and had unrealistic accessibility for 49% of the patients with IT (68% with PTC). Interdisciplinary multimodal pain programs in day clinics were at a critically reachable distance for 68% of patients with IT (83% with PTC) and in 49% (75% PTC) at an unrealistic travelling time distance considering the more intense treatment requiring frequent travel. Full inpatient interdisciplinary multimodal treatment was more realistically reachable (IT 39% critical, 14% unrealistic, PTC 61% critical, 48% unrealistic).

CONCLUSION

The results show relevant nationwide differences in the accessibility of facilities for specialized pain treatment depending on the place of residence. Considering the treatment of a chronic condition with long-term therapeutic goals and the need for graduated care (outpatient and inpatient treatment), the results reveal a partly critical situation from the patient's perspective.

摘要

背景与目的

慢性疼痛需要分级和分阶段的护理。本研究的目的是从患者角度提供德国专科门诊和(部分)住院疼痛医学护理可及性的区域概述。

材料与方法

从德国邮政编码位置组合中随机生成1000名模型患者,使用路线规划器评估驾车出行时间(个体交通,IT)以及前往最近的专科门诊和住院疼痛医学诊所及科室的可用公共交通连接(PTC)。

结果

门诊设施(在诊所环境中)大多根据疼痛治疗比例和网络结构实际可达。大学疼痛门诊对于70%的患者驾车出行距离处于临界可达范围(80%通过公共交通可达),对于49%的患者驾车出行可达性不现实(68%通过公共交通)。日间诊所的跨学科多模式疼痛项目对于68%的患者驾车出行距离处于临界可达范围(83%通过公共交通可达),考虑到更强化的治疗需要频繁出行,49%(75%通过公共交通)处于不现实的出行时间距离。完全住院的跨学科多模式治疗更实际可达(驾车出行39%临界,14%不现实,公共交通61%临界,48%不现实)。

结论

结果显示,根据居住地点不同,全国范围内专科疼痛治疗设施的可及性存在显著差异。考虑到慢性疾病的治疗具有长期治疗目标以及分级护理(门诊和住院治疗)的需求,从患者角度来看,结果显示出部分严峻情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验