Green Harold D, Hoover Matthew A, Wagner Glenn J, Ryan Gery W, Ssegujja Eric
RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407.
Makarere University School of Public Health New Mulago Hospital Complex, IPH Building, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Field methods. 2014 May;26(2):126-140. doi: 10.1177/1525822x13492676. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
In personal network studies, respondents (egos) are asked to report information about members of their personal network (alters); egos respond based on their perceptions. Previous studies of informant accuracy present a varied picture: Some find egos' reporting on their relationships with alters to be accurate; others do not. In our study of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) in Uganda, egos were asked to invite up to four alters named during their interview to answer questions about their relationship with ego. Using Gower's general coefficient of similarity, we calculated a measure of accuracy both by variable and by alter. Our analysis by variable tends to confirm informant accuracy research, while our analysis by alter adds to the literature by identifying how accurate a particular ego is when discussing an alter and what characteristics might be associated with accuracy or inaccuracy.
在个人网络研究中,受访者(自我)被要求报告其个人网络成员(他人)的信息;自我根据自身认知做出回应。以往关于信息提供者准确性的研究呈现出不同的情况:一些研究发现自我对其与他人关系的报告是准确的;另一些则不然。在我们对乌干达艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者(PLHA)的研究中,自我被要求邀请在访谈中提到的至多四名他人来回答关于他们与自我关系的问题。我们使用高尔相似度通用系数,按变量和他人分别计算了准确性度量。我们按变量进行的分析倾向于证实信息提供者准确性研究,而我们按他人进行的分析则通过确定特定自我在讨论某个他人时的准确程度以及哪些特征可能与准确性或不准确性相关,为该文献增添了内容。