Jackson Sarah E, Squires Hazel, Shahab Lion, Tattan-Birch Harry, Buckley Charlotte, Purshouse Robin C, Brown Jamie
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 24;27(3):447-456. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae225.
Studies consistently demonstrate smoking is a socially contagious behavior, but less is known about the influence of social connections on vaping. This study examined associations between having close social connections who smoke or vape and relevant smoking and vaping outcomes.
This was a representative cross-sectional survey of adults (≥16 years) in England. Participants (n = 1618) were asked how many people they discuss important matters with (ie, close social connections) and how many of them smoke/vape. We tested associations between (1) smoking and (2) vaping among close social connections and participants' own smoking and vaping status; harm perceptions of e-cigarettes (among current smokers); attempts and success in quitting smoking (among past-year smokers); and use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid (among past-year smokers who tried to quit).
Adults with ≥1 close social connection who smoke were more likely than those with none to smoke themselves (32.8% vs. 9.4%; ORadj = 7.23[95% CI: 4.74 to 11.0]) and had an uncertain lower likelihood to quit (12.2% vs. 19.8%; ORadj = 0.46[0.17-1.23]). Those with ≥1 close social connection who vape were more likely than those with none to vape themselves (29.6% vs. 6.3%; ORadj = 5.16[3.15-8.43]) and to use e-cigarettes in their most recent attempt to quit (57.0% vs. 27.9%; ORadj = 18.0[1.80-181]), and had an uncertain higher likelihood to perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes (30.8% vs. 12.2%; ORadj = 2.37[0.82-6.90]).
In England, we replicated well-established associations with smoking and found similar evidence for vaping. People were much more likely to vape and to use e-cigarettes to quit smoking if they had close social connections who vaped.
The cross-sectional design means it is not clear whether smoking/vaping among close social connections influences people to smoke/vape themselves, or whether people who smoke/vape select to form close social connections with others who similarly smoke/vape. Further research is required to establish causality. If the associations we observed are causal, interventions that encourage smokers to switch to vaping may have positive spillover effects on social connections' perceptions of e-cigarettes and the use of these products to support smoking cessation.
研究一直表明吸烟是一种具有社会传染性的行为,但关于社会关系对吸电子烟的影响却知之甚少。本研究调查了有吸烟或吸电子烟的亲密社会关系者与相关吸烟和吸电子烟结果之间的关联。
这是一项针对英格兰成年人(≥16岁)的代表性横断面调查。参与者(n = 1618)被问及他们与多少人讨论重要事情(即亲密社会关系)以及其中有多少人吸烟/吸电子烟。我们测试了(1)亲密社会关系中的吸烟情况和(2)吸电子烟情况与参与者自身吸烟和吸电子烟状况之间的关联;对电子烟的危害认知(在当前吸烟者中);戒烟尝试及成功情况(在过去一年的吸烟者中);以及将电子烟用作戒烟辅助工具的情况(在过去一年尝试戒烟的吸烟者中)。
有≥1个吸烟的亲密社会关系的成年人比没有此类关系的成年人更有可能自己吸烟(32.8%对9.4%;校正后比值比=7.23[95%置信区间:4.74至11.0]),且戒烟可能性有不确定的降低(12.2%对19.8%;校正后比值比=0.46[0.17 - 1.23])。有≥1个吸电子烟的亲密社会关系的成年人比没有此类关系的成年人更有可能自己吸电子烟(29.6%对6.3%;校正后比值比=5.16[3.15 - 8.