Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore.
Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah School of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Oct;30(10):1078-1086. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1078.
Because of concerns of cost-effectiveness and low utilization, in 2018, manufacturers initiated a 60% price reduction for inhibitors, reducing the list price from more than $14,000 to $5,850. The goal of the reduction was to increase access and lower patient cost sharing for inhibitors.
To determine whether list price reductions resulted in a statistically significant decrease in patient cost sharing for inhibitors. The secondary objective is to quantify the change in monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) cost in the years following the price reduction policies.
This analysis uses a cross-sectional quasi-experimental design, with 2 time periods, to estimate the change in monthly OOP cost. A 2-stage cost model was used to quantify the difference in mean monthly OOP cost between the preprice and postprice reduction periods. This analysis was completed using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics health plan claims for inhibitors between January 2016 and December 2021 for commercially insured individuals in the United States. The primary exposure of interest is a manufacturer-initiated list price reduction in October 2018. The primary outcome of interest is the difference in the predicted monthly OOP cost between the prereduction and postreduction periods.
There was a 50% decrease in the predicted monthly OOP cost, from $235.22 (SD = $241) in the prereduction period to $116.75 (SD = $152) in the postreduction period.
This claims level analysis used robust statistical modeling techniques to quantify the effect of manufacturer-initiated price reductions on monthly OOP cost. This unique manufacturer decision resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the monthly OOP cost for beneficiaries using inhibitors. Manufacturer-initiated price reductions could be a strategy to reduce the cost for other therapies with access and cost concerns. Further research is needed on the downstream patient-level effects of cost reductions, particularly among individuals who experience multiple barriers to care.
由于对成本效益和利用率低的担忧,2018 年制造商对抑制剂发起了 60%的降价,将标价从 14000 多美元降至 5850 美元。降价的目的是增加抑制剂的可及性并降低患者的自付费用。
确定标价降低是否导致抑制剂的患者自付费用有统计学意义的降低。次要目标是量化降价政策实施后的几年中每月自付额(OOP)的变化。
本分析采用具有 2 个时间阶段的横截面准实验设计,以估计每月 OOP 成本的变化。使用两阶段成本模型来量化降价前后期间平均每月 OOP 成本的差异。这项分析是使用 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics 健康计划在美国商业保险个人的抑制剂索赔数据,在 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间完成的。感兴趣的主要暴露因素是制造商在 2018 年 10 月发起的标价降低。主要观察结果是降价前后预测每月 OOP 成本的差异。
每月 OOP 成本的降幅为 50%,从降价前的 235.22 美元(标准差 [SD] = 241 美元)降至降价后的 116.75 美元(SD = 152 美元)。
这项基于索赔的分析使用了强大的统计建模技术来量化制造商发起的价格降低对每月 OOP 成本的影响。这种独特的制造商决策导致使用抑制剂的受益人的每月 OOP 成本有统计学意义的降低。制造商发起的价格降低可能是降低其他具有获取和成本问题的疗法成本的一种策略。需要进一步研究成本降低对患者层面的下游影响,特别是在面临多种护理障碍的个体中。