Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Cells. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):1569. doi: 10.3390/cells13181569.
The establishment of immunotherapy applying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has provided an important new option for the treatment of solid malignant diseases. However, different tumor entities show dramatically different responses to this therapy. BCC responds worse to anti-PD-1 ICIs as compared to cSCC. Differential immune checkpoint expression could explain this discrepancy and, therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze activating and inhibitory immune checkpoints in cSCC and BCC tissues. Tissue microarrays of the invasive front as well as the tumor core of BCC and cSCC samples were used to evaluate PD-1, PD-L1, CD28, and CD86 expression and their topographic distribution profiles by chromogenic immunohistochemistry. QuPath was used to determine the labeling index. The expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and CD28 was significantly higher in both the tumor core and the invasive front of cSCC samples as compared to BCC ( < 0.001). In addition, the ratios of PD-L1/CD86 ( < 0.001) and CD28/CD86 ( < 0.001) were significantly higher in cSCC. The invasive front of both tumor entities showed higher expression levels of all immune markers compared to the tumor core in both tumor entities. The significantly higher expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and CD28 in cSCC, along with the predominance of the inhibitory ligand PD-L1 as compared to the activating CD86 in cSCC, provide a potential explanation for the better objective response rates to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as compared to BCC. Furthermore, the predominant site of interaction between the immune system and the tumor was within the invasive front in both tumor types.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的免疫疗法的建立为治疗实体恶性肿瘤提供了一个重要的新选择。然而,不同的肿瘤实体对这种治疗的反应有很大的不同。与 cSCC 相比,BCC 对抗 PD-1 ICI 的反应更差。免疫检查点的差异表达可以解释这种差异,因此,本研究的目的是分析 cSCC 和 BCC 组织中的激活和抑制性免疫检查点。使用侵袭前沿和 BCC 和 cSCC 样本肿瘤核心的组织微阵列,通过显色免疫组织化学评估 PD-1、PD-L1、CD28 和 CD86 的表达及其拓扑分布模式。使用 QuPath 确定标记指数。与 BCC 相比,cSCC 样本的肿瘤核心和侵袭前沿中 PD-1、PD-L1 和 CD28 的表达均显著更高(<0.001)。此外,cSCC 中 PD-L1/CD86(<0.001)和 CD28/CD86(<0.001)的比值显著更高。与肿瘤核心相比,两种肿瘤实体的侵袭前沿的所有免疫标志物表达水平均更高。cSCC 中 PD-1、PD-L1 和 CD28 的表达显著更高,与 cSCC 中作为激活性 CD86 的抑制性配体 PD-L1 的优势相比,为抗 PD-1 免疫治疗与 BCC 相比更好的客观缓解率提供了潜在解释。此外,在两种肿瘤类型中,免疫系统与肿瘤之间的主要相互作用部位都在侵袭前沿。