Calandrino Andrea, Caruggi Samuele, Vinci Francesco, Battaglini Marcella, Massirio Paolo, Cipresso Gaia, Andreato Chiara, Brigati Giorgia, Parodi Alessandro, Polleri Giulia, Minghetti Diego, Ramenghi Luca Antonio
Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Maternal and Neonatal Health, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy.
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;11(9):1088. doi: 10.3390/children11091088.
Thirty years ago, the first attempt by Saliba and colleagues was made to reduce the negative effects (hypercarbia) of exogenous surfactant (ES) by slowing its administration. Sixteen years later, we observed the first less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) attempt by Kribs and colleagues. Many studies, since that time, have tried to minimize the invasiveness of ES and subsequent cerebral blood flow perturbations through studies using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). We sought to address this medical challenge by identifying a less problematic modality of ES administration by delivering multiple aliquots of ES instead of a single one, as typically performed. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a different way of administering ES using more aliquots could be a safe alternative that should be assessed in further studies.
Patients between 26 + 0 and 35 + 6 weeks of gestational age (GA) requiring ES administration were enrolled (April 2023-February 2024). Differently fractioned doses were delivered according to an arbitrary standard dosage (0.3 mL per aliquot in babies < 29 weeks; 0.6 mL in babies ≥ 29 weeks), while NIRS and transcutaneous CO (tCO) monitoring were always performed. ES's effectiveness was assessed based on the reduction in the Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI) after administration. Persistent desaturation, bradycardia, and airway obstruction were defined as adverse effects and used to evaluate safety during ES administration, as well as variability in NIRS-rSO values and tCO.
Twenty-four patients were enrolled with a median GA of 29 weeks (IQR 4.5) and BW of 1223 ± 560 g. In addition, 50% of the cohort received fewer than three aliquots, whereas the other 50% received more than three. Monitoring was started before the procedure and continued 30' after the last ES aliquot administration. The variability in NIRS-SpO values was significantly higher in the group ( = 0.007) with a lower number of aliquots administered. Similarly, increased NIRS-rSO values ( = 0.003) and increased tCO levels ( = 0.005) were observed in infants who underwent an ES split after the administration of a low number of aliquots.
Our data obtained from the group with > 3 fractionated doses of ES seem to justify the preparation of a more robust study, as the combination of reduced NIRS variability and reduced tCO maximum levels is consistent with more stable cerebral blood flow during the challenging time of ES administration.
30年前,萨利巴及其同事首次尝试通过减缓外源性表面活性剂(ES)的给药速度来减轻其负面影响(高碳酸血症)。16年后,我们观察到克里布斯及其同事首次进行了微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)尝试。从那时起,许多研究试图通过使用近红外光谱(NIRS)的研究来尽量减少ES的侵入性以及随后的脑血流扰动。我们试图通过确定一种问题较少的ES给药方式来应对这一医学挑战,即像通常那样单次给药改为多次给予ES。本研究的目的是检验这样一个假设,即采用更多份剂量的不同ES给药方式可能是一种安全的替代方法,应在进一步研究中进行评估。
纳入孕周(GA)在26 + 0至35 + 6周之间需要给予ES的患者(2023年4月至2024年2月)。根据任意标准剂量给予不同分次剂量(孕周小于29周的婴儿每份0.3 mL;孕周≥29周的婴儿每份0.6 mL),同时始终进行NIRS和经皮二氧化碳(tCO)监测。根据给药后氧饱和度指数(OSI)的降低来评估ES的有效性。持续性低氧血症、心动过缓和气道阻塞被定义为不良反应,并用于评估ES给药期间的安全性,以及NIRS-rSO值和tCO的变异性。
纳入24例患者,中位GA为29周(四分位间距4.5),体重为1223 ± 560 g。此外,队列中50%的患者接受的份数少于三份,而另外50%的患者接受的份数多于三份。监测在操作前开始,并在最后一次给予ES份剂后持续30分钟。给予份数较少的组中NIRS-SpO值的变异性显著更高(P = 0.007)。同样,在给予份数较少后接受ES分次给药的婴儿中,观察到NIRS-rSO值升高(P = 0.003)和tCO水平升高(P = 0.005)。
我们从接受超过3份分次剂量ES的组中获得的数据似乎为开展一项更有力的研究提供了依据,因为NIRS变异性降低和tCO最高水平降低相结合,与ES给药这一具有挑战性时期脑血流更稳定相一致。