Zheng Hao, Zheng Yao
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Assessment. 2025 Sep;32(6):899-920. doi: 10.1177/10731911241283908. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
Previous investigations on the underlying structure of psychopathology symptoms primarily focused at the between-person level and among adult samples. This study used two independent Canadian samples with month-long daily diary designs to investigate daily psychopathology structure at both within- and between-person level among adolescents ( = 99, 2,132 daily reports) and young adults ( = 313, 6,431 and 4,018 daily reports at each wave). Four mainstream types of psychopathology structure were compared based on a comprehensive set of standards. The results suggest that the general factor of psychopathology ( factor) derived from the higher-order and bifactor models performed similarly well at both within- and between-person levels, while the specific factors estimated in the bifactor models demonstrated low reliability and consistency over time. Psychopathology manifests as multidimensional at the within-person level but unidimensional at the between-person level. The current findings inform the development of future prevention and intervention programs by supporting the adoption of transdiagnostic treatment that addresses multiple psychopathology symptoms with a holistic approach.
以往对精神病理学症状潜在结构的研究主要集中在个体间层面以及成人样本中。本研究使用了两个独立的加拿大样本,采用为期一个月的每日日记设计,以调查青少年(n = 99,2132份每日报告)和青年成人(n = 313,每一波次分别有6431份和4018份每日报告)在个体内和个体间层面的每日精神病理学结构。基于一套全面的标准,对四种主流的精神病理学结构类型进行了比较。结果表明,从高阶模型和双因素模型中得出的精神病理学一般因素(g因素)在个体内和个体间层面的表现同样良好,而双因素模型中估计的特定因素随时间显示出低信度和低一致性。精神病理学在个体内层面表现为多维的,但在个体间层面表现为单维的。当前的研究结果通过支持采用以整体方法解决多种精神病理学症状的跨诊断治疗,为未来预防和干预项目的发展提供了参考。