Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.
Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario.
Psychol Aging. 2024 Nov;39(7):770-780. doi: 10.1037/pag0000850. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
Older adults experience a greater benefit from multisensory integration than their younger counterparts, but it is unclear why. One hypothesis is that age-related sensory decline weakens unisensory stimulus effectiveness, causing a boost in multisensory gain through inverse effectiveness. Many previous studies present stimuli at the same intensity for both younger and older adults (i.e., stimulus-matched), as opposed to accounting for each participant's unique perceptual ability (i.e., perception-matched). This makes it difficult to discern the source of age-related differences in multisensory gain. As such, we used two experiments to examine whether sensory decline is contributing to age-related differences in multisensory gain. In the first, we presented auditory (pure tones in noise), visual (Gabor patches in noise), and audiovisual stimuli and recorded response times from 31 younger (18-25) and 30 older (55-80) adults. Importantly, all participants were given identical stimuli, with the expectation that older adults would show worse unisensory performance, inducing inverse effectiveness. The second task was identical (younger = 31, older = 34), except stimuli were presented at each participant's 50% detection threshold, identified with an adaptive psychophysical staircase, controlling for any influence of inverse effectiveness. Older adults were found to exhibit greater multisensory gain (as measured by race model violations) on stimulus- but not perception-matched tasks, thus aligning with the principle of inverse effectiveness. That is, when accounting for potential age-related differences in perceptual abilities, older adults no longer experienced greater benefit from multisensory integration. These two experiments together suggest that the age-related increases in multisensory integration previously reported may be in part due to age-related declines in vision and audition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
老年人从多感觉整合中获益比年轻人更大,但原因尚不清楚。一种假设是,与年龄相关的感觉衰退削弱了单感觉刺激的有效性,通过反向有效性增强了多感觉增益。许多先前的研究为年轻和老年人呈现相同强度的刺激(即刺激匹配),而不是考虑每个参与者独特的感知能力(即感知匹配)。这使得很难辨别多感觉增益中与年龄相关的差异的来源。因此,我们使用了两个实验来检验感觉衰退是否是导致多感觉增益与年龄相关差异的原因。在第一个实验中,我们呈现了听觉(噪声中的纯音)、视觉(噪声中的 Gabor 补丁)和视听刺激,并记录了 31 名年轻(18-25 岁)和 30 名老年(55-80 岁)成年人的反应时间。重要的是,所有参与者都接受了相同的刺激,预计老年人的单感觉表现会更差,从而产生反向有效性。第二个任务与第一个任务相同(年轻组=31,老年组=34),只是刺激在每个参与者的 50%检测阈值处呈现,使用自适应心理物理阶梯来识别,以控制反向有效性的任何影响。结果发现,老年人在刺激匹配任务中表现出更大的多感觉增益(如种族模型违反所测量),而不是在感知匹配任务中表现出更大的多感觉增益,这与反向有效性的原则一致。也就是说,当考虑到与年龄相关的感知能力差异时,老年人不再从多感觉整合中获得更大的益处。这两个实验共同表明,先前报道的与年龄相关的多感觉整合增加可能部分是由于视觉和听觉与年龄相关的衰退。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。