School Mask Mandates and COVID-19: The Challenge of Using Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Observational Data to Estimate the Effectiveness of a Public Health Intervention.

BACKGROUND

There are considerable challenges when using difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis of ecological data to estimate the effectiveness of public health interventions in rapidly changing situations.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the shortcomings of DiD methodology for the estimation of the effects of public health interventions using ecological data.

DESIGN

As an example, the authors consider an analysis that used DiD methodology and reported a causal reduction in COVID-19 cases due to the maintenance of school mask mandates. They did alternate analyses using various control groups to assess the robustness of the prior analysis.

SETTING

School districts in the greater Boston area and Massachusetts during the 2021-to-2022 academic year.

PARTICIPANTS

Students and school staff.

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in COVID-19 case rates in districts that did and did not lift mask mandates.

RESULTS

Important potential confounders rendered DiD methodology inappropriate for causal inference, including prior immunity, temporal variation in rates of infection, and changes in testing practices. The racial composition and income of intervention and control groups also differed substantially. Compared with maintaining the mask requirement, dropping the requirement was associated with anywhere from an increase of 5.64 cases (95% CI, 3.00 to 8.29 cases) per 1000 persons to a decrease of 2.74 cases (CI, 0.63 to 4.85 cases) per 1000 persons, depending on choice of control group and whether students or staff were examined.

LIMITATION

Ecological data were used; detailed data on all potential confounders were unavailable.

CONCLUSION

Alternate analyses yielded estimates consistent with a wide range of both negative and positive associations in COVID-19 case rates after removal of mask mandates. The findings highlight the challenges of using DiD analysis of ecological data to estimate the effectiveness of interventions in divergent intervention and control groups during rapidly changing circumstances.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.